Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLXRX vs RWMFX
CLXRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts CLXRX vs RWMFX
CLXRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLXRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLXRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. CLXRX (3.1B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than CLXRX: RWMFX (1.40) vs CLXRX (0.90). CLXRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: CLXRX (14 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than CLXRX (0.20). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CLXRX (5.00). CLXRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: CLXRX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. CLXRX (2.23). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. CLXRX (2.85).
| CLXRX | RWMFX | CLXRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.31 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.31 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.480 | 5.575 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.1B | 214B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.40 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.23 | 8.10 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.02 | 33.11 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.85 | 26.71 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.86 | 85.42 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement