CMA
Price
$70.64
Change
-$0.18 (-0.25%)
Updated
Aug 29, 03:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.1B
49 days until earnings call
UBCP
Price
$14.51
Change
+$0.26 (+1.82%)
Updated
Aug 29, 03:20 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
82.28M
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMA vs UBCP

Header iconCMA vs UBCP Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs UBCPBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$70.64
Change-$0.18 (-0.25%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.1B
United Ban
Price$14.51
Change+$0.26 (+1.82%)
Volume$320
Capitalization82.28M
CMA vs UBCP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMA vs. UBCP commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a Buy and UBCP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CMA: $70.82 vs. UBCP: $14.25)
Brand notoriety: CMA and UBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 57% vs. UBCP: 50%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $9.1B vs. UBCP: $82.28M
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.1B. UBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $82.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUBCP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UBCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBCP is a better buy in the long-term than CMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBCP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UBCP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBCP is a better buy in the short-term than CMA.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.80% price change this week, while UBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

UBCP is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.26% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMA($9.1B) has a higher market cap than UBCP($82.3M). CMA has higher P/E ratio than UBCP: CMA (13.59) vs UBCP (11.22). CMA YTD gains are higher at: 17.395 vs. UBCP (14.101). CMA has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. UBCP (7.91M). UBCP has less debt than CMA: UBCP (102M) vs CMA (8.69B). CMA has higher revenues than UBCP: CMA (3.31B) vs UBCP (30.4M).
CMAUBCPCMA / UBCP
Capitalization9.1B82.3M11,060%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.39514.101123%
P/E Ratio13.5911.22121%
Revenue3.31B30.4M10,901%
Total Cash1.08B7.91M13,700%
Total Debt8.69B102M8,517%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs UBCP: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
UBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6031
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5656
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBCP's Valuation (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMA (89) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.

UBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (56) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

UBCP's SMR Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBCP (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBCP’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBCP (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to UBCP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMAUBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JANWX126.680.52
+0.41%
Janus Henderson Global Research D
RWMBX64.550.24
+0.37%
American Funds Washington Mutual R2
JEVNX10.31N/A
N/A
JHancock Disciplined Value Em Mkts EqNAV
PSOPX28.93N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Value I
CMJIX44.63N/A
N/A
Calvert US Mid Cap Core Rspnb Idx I

CMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMA has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMA jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMA
1D Price
Change %
CMA100%
-0.32%
FNB - CMA
86%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
WTFC - CMA
85%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
ZION - CMA
85%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
BKU - CMA
85%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
CFG - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
More

UBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBCP has been loosely correlated with BSBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBCP jumps, then BSBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBCP
1D Price
Change %
UBCP100%
N/A
BSBK - UBCP
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TFC - UBCP
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
BKSC - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
CMA - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
MGYR - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
More