CMA
Price
$76.47
Change
+$0.32 (+0.42%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.77B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBCP
Price
$13.00
Change
+$0.04 (+0.31%)
Updated
Nov 19, 12:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
75.5M
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMA vs UBCP

Header iconCMA vs UBCP Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs UBCPBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$76.47
Change+$0.32 (+0.42%)
Volume$14.04K
Capitalization9.77B
United Ban
Price$13.00
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
Volume$100
Capitalization75.5M
CMA vs UBCP Comparison Chart in %
CMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMA vs. UBCP commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a Hold and UBCP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CMA: $76.15 vs. UBCP: $12.96)
Brand notoriety: CMA and UBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 64% vs. UBCP: 31%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $9.77B vs. UBCP: $75.5M
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.77B. UBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $75.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUBCP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CMA and UBCP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBCP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UBCP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBCP is a better buy in the short-term than CMA.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.61% price change this week, while UBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

UBCP is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.96% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMA($9.77B) has a higher market cap than UBCP($75.5M). CMA has higher P/E ratio than UBCP: CMA (14.62) vs UBCP (9.98). CMA YTD gains are higher at: 28.051 vs. UBCP (5.102). CMA has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. UBCP (7.87M). UBCP has less debt than CMA: UBCP (102M) vs CMA (5.42B). CMA has higher revenues than UBCP: CMA (3.34B) vs UBCP (30.4M).
CMAUBCPCMA / UBCP
Capitalization9.77B75.5M12,938%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.0515.102550%
P/E Ratio14.629.98146%
Revenue3.34B30.4M10,990%
Total Cash1.24B7.87M15,749%
Total Debt5.42B102M5,316%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs UBCP: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
UBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1513
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5570
SMR RATING
1..100
1053
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6031
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBCP's Valuation (20) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMA (90) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew significantly faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBCP (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to UBCP’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's SMR Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBCP (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBCP’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBCP (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBCP’s over the last 12 months.

UBCP's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (60) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMAUBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASMH71.542.48
+3.59%
ASML HOLDING NV ADRHEDGED ASMH
EPU61.250.93
+1.54%
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
ARP31.09-0.01
-0.03%
PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF
VTEI100.78-0.09
-0.09%
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tx-Exm Bd ETF
DIVN25.96-0.08
-0.30%
Horizon Dividend Income ETF

CMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMA has been closely correlated with WBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMA jumps, then WBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMA
1D Price
Change %
CMA100%
+0.42%
WBS - CMA
83%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
CFG - CMA
83%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
FNB - CMA
82%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
WTFC - CMA
81%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
VLY - CMA
81%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
More