CMA
Price
$57.97
Change
+$0.48 (+0.83%)
Updated
Sep 16, 09:55 AM (EDT)
32 days until earnings call
UBCP
Price
$11.94
Change
+$0.05 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 16, 09:30 AM (EDT)
37 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMA vs UBCP

Header iconCMA vs UBCP Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs UBCPBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$57.97
Change+$0.48 (+0.83%)
Volume$1.2K
CapitalizationN/A
United Ban
Price$11.94
Change+$0.05 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CMA vs UBCP Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CMA vs. UBCP commentary
Sep 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a StrongBuy and UBCP is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2024
Stock price -- (CMA: $57.49 vs. UBCP: $11.89)
Brand notoriety: CMA and UBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 76% vs. UBCP: 80%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $7.17B vs. UBCP: $82.52M
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.17B. UBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $82.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUBCP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UBCP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMA is a better buy in the long-term than UBCP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.10% price change this week, while UBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Oct 18, 2024.

UBCP is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMA($7.17B) has a higher market cap than UBCP($82.5M). UBCP has higher P/E ratio than CMA: UBCP (9.46) vs CMA (8.40). CMA YTD gains are higher at: 7.351 vs. UBCP (-2.097). CMA has more cash in the bank: 1.44B vs. UBCP (7.95M). UBCP has less debt than CMA: UBCP (102M) vs CMA (9.77B). CMA has higher revenues than UBCP: CMA (3.59B) vs UBCP (29.9M).
CMAUBCPCMA / UBCP
Capitalization7.17B82.5M8,690%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.351-2.097-351%
P/E Ratio8.409.4689%
Revenue3.59B29.9M12,013%
Total Cash1.44B7.95M18,146%
Total Debt9.77B102M9,579%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs UBCP: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
UBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8214
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7861
SMR RATING
1..100
850
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
752
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
15n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBCP's Valuation (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (62) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

UBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (78) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's SMR Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBCP (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBCP’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBCP (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBCP’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBCP (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBCP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FOVAX30.250.62
+2.09%
First Trust/Confluence Small Cap Val A
FDGIX24.290.24
+1.00%
Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth I
PRAEX31.090.27
+0.88%
Principal Real Estate Securities R1
BLRCX12.280.09
+0.74%
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate C
BTBFX64.420.29
+0.45%
Boston Trust Asset Management

UBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBCP and TFC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBCP and TFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBCP
1D Price
Change %
UBCP100%
-0.08%
TFC - UBCP
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
NSTS - UBCP
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
BKSC - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMA - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.66%
MGYR - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More