Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs COEAX
CMBFX vs COEAX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs COEAX
CMBFX vs COEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. COEAX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and COEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX (293M) and COEAX (293M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CMBFX pays higher dividends than COEAX: CMBFX (2.49) vs COEAX (2.24). CMBFX was incepted earlier than COEAX: CMBFX (42 years) vs COEAX (24 years). COEAX (0.85) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). CMBFX (12.00) and COEAX (12.00) have comparable annual turnover. CMBFX (2000) and COEAX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.32 vs. COEAX (5.06). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.70 vs. COEAX (2.41).
| CMBFX | COEAX | CMBFX / COEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.84 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.85 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.039 | 0.934 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 293M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 2.24 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.32 | 5.06 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.64 | 8.82 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.70 | 2.41 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.65 | 11.84 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement