Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ETNCX
CMBFX vs ETNCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ETNCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.27M
Eaton Vance NC Municipal Income A
Price$8.40
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.41M
CMBFX vs ETNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ETNCX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ETNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. ETNCX (239M). ETNCX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ETNCX (2.98) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ETNCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ETNCX (32 years). ETNCX (0.70) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ETNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). ETNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ETNCX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.87 vs. ETNCX (2.08). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.13 vs. ETNCX (1.12).
| CMBFX | ETNCX | CMBFX / ETNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.70 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.70 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.224 | 2.472 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 239M | 123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.98 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.87 | 2.08 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.39 | 11.37 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.13 | 1.12 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.88 | 3.58 | 443% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement