Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs FORCX
CMBFX vs FORCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs FORCX
CMBFX vs FORCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. FORCX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and FORCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 294M vs. FORCX (240M). FORCX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: FORCX (3.03) vs CMBFX (2.49). CMBFX was incepted earlier than FORCX: CMBFX (42 years) vs FORCX (29 years). FORCX (0.63) and CMBFX (0.60) have similar cost to investors . FORCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). CMBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FORCX: CMBFX (2000) vs FORCX (100000). FORCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. CMBFX (5.32). FORCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.79 vs. CMBFX (4.20).
| CMBFX | FORCX | CMBFX / FORCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.63 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.63 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.125 | 1.079 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 240M | 123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 3.03 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.32 | 5.89 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.54 | 10.82 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.20 | 4.79 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.22 | 18.13 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement