Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs KSMUX
CMBFX vs KSMUX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs KSMUX
CMBFX vs KSMUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. KSMUX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and KSMUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. KSMUX (44.7M). KSMUX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: KSMUX (3.21) vs CMBFX (2.49). CMBFX was incepted earlier than KSMUX: CMBFX (42 years) vs KSMUX (36 years). KSMUX (1.17) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). KSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.15 vs. CMBFX (12.00). KSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: KSMUX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). KSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. CMBFX (5.50). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.29 vs. KSMUX (-0.42).
| CMBFX | KSMUX | CMBFX / KSMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.98 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.17 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.211 | 2.422 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 44.7M | 655% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 3.21 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.50 | 7.77 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.63 | 8.35 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.29 | -0.42 | -1,015% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.31 | 10.70 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement