CMBT
Price
$8.72
Change
+$0.71 (+8.86%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.23B
32 days until earnings call
FRO
Price
$15.50
Change
+$1.47 (+10.48%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
5.33B
48 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMBT vs FRO

Header iconCMBT vs FRO Comparison
Open Charts CMBT vs FROBanner chart's image
CMB.TECH
Price$8.72
Change+$0.71 (+8.86%)
Volume$72.61K
Capitalization3.23B
Frontline
Price$15.50
Change+$1.47 (+10.48%)
Volume$4.72M
Capitalization5.33B
CMBT vs FRO Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMBT vs. FRO commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBT is a StrongBuy and FRO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CMBT: $8.72 vs. FRO: $15.50)
Brand notoriety: CMBT: Notable vs. FRO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMBT: 89% vs. FRO: 146%
Market capitalization -- CMBT: $3.23B vs. FRO: $5.33B
CMBT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $3.23B. FRO’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $5.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRO is a better buy in the long-term than CMBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMBT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMBT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FRO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMBT is a better buy in the short-term than FRO.

Price Growth

CMBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +7.65% price change this week, while FRO (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +20.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

FRO is expected to report earnings on Aug 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.61% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRO($5.33B) has a higher market cap than CMBT($3.23B). FRO has higher P/E ratio than CMBT: FRO (6.80) vs CMBT (3.89). FRO YTD gains are higher at: 10.648 vs. CMBT (-12.185). CMBT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.05B vs. FRO (938M). CMBT has less debt than FRO: CMBT (1.79B) vs FRO (2.26B). FRO has higher revenues than CMBT: FRO (1.92B) vs CMBT (1.34B).
CMBTFROCMBT / FRO
Capitalization3.23B5.33B61%
EBITDA1.05B938M112%
Gain YTD-12.18510.648-114%
P/E Ratio3.896.8057%
Revenue1.34B1.92B70%
Total Cash160MN/A-
Total Debt1.79B2.26B79%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMBT vs FRO: Fundamental Ratings
CMBT
FRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7476
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9343
SMR RATING
1..100
1540
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8782
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9245
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMBT's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FRO (5) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (93) in the null industry. This means that FRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as FRO (40) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's Price Growth Rating (82) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CMBT (87) in the null industry. This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (92) in the null industry. This means that FRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMBTFRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APDYX21.310.46
+2.21%
Artisan Developing World Advisor
FCNKX19.23N/A
N/A
Fidelity Contrafund K
CCCNX6.18N/A
N/A
Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Foc I
FTVSX29.80N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val Instl
MDEFX19.69N/A
N/A
BlackRock International Select Eq Inv A

CMBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBT has been loosely correlated with NVGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBT jumps, then NVGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBT
1D Price
Change %
CMBT100%
+8.86%
NVGS - CMBT
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.31%
TNK - CMBT
55%
Loosely correlated
+9.78%
DHT - CMBT
54%
Loosely correlated
+7.72%
HYTLF - CMBT
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FRO - CMBT
53%
Loosely correlated
+10.48%
More

FRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRO has been closely correlated with DHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRO jumps, then DHT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRO
1D Price
Change %
FRO100%
+10.48%
DHT - FRO
87%
Closely correlated
+7.72%
TNK - FRO
77%
Closely correlated
+9.78%
INSW - FRO
75%
Closely correlated
+8.45%
STNG - FRO
74%
Closely correlated
+7.21%
TRMD - FRO
69%
Closely correlated
+4.07%
More