It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMBT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CMBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -1.48% price change this week, while FRO (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.97%.
CMBT is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
FRO is expected to report earnings on Feb 28, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
CMBT | FRO | CMBT / FRO | |
Capitalization | 3.23B | 5.33B | 61% |
EBITDA | 1.05B | 938M | 112% |
Gain YTD | -22.744 | 2.647 | -859% |
P/E Ratio | 3.89 | 6.80 | 57% |
Revenue | 1.34B | 1.92B | 70% |
Total Cash | 160M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 1.79B | 2.26B | 79% |
CMBT | FRO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMBT's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FRO (4) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.
FRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (67) in the null industry. This means that FRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.
CMBT's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as FRO (39) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.
FRO's Price Growth Rating (81) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CMBT (88) in the null industry. This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.
FRO's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (97) in the null industry. This means that FRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.
CMBT | FRO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago76% | 3 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago61% | 3 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago64% | 3 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 6 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBT has been loosely correlated with HYTLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBT jumps, then HYTLF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CMBT | 100% | -1.63% | ||
HYTLF - CMBT | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
NVGS - CMBT | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
FRO - CMBT | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.78% | ||
DHT - CMBT | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.24% | ||
TRMD - CMBT | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.30% | ||
More |