CMBT
Price
$14.43
Change
-$0.38 (-2.57%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.38B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRO
Price
$34.16
Change
-$0.31 (-0.90%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.67B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMBT vs FRO

Header iconCMBT vs FRO Comparison
Open Charts CMBT vs FROBanner chart's image
CMBT vs FRO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMBT vs. FRO commentary
Jun 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBT is a Hold and FRO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2026
Stock price -- (CMBT: $14.81 vs. FRO: $34.46)
Brand notoriety: CMBT: Notable vs. FRO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMBT: 88% vs. FRO: 55%
Market capitalization -- CMBT: $4.38B vs. FRO: $7.67B
CMBT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $4.38B. FRO’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $7.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $122.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMBT is a better buy in the long-term than FRO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMBT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMBT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMBT and FRO are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.96% price change this week, while FRO (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -2.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

FRO is expected to report earnings on Aug 31, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.89% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRO($7.67B) has a higher market cap than CMBT($4.38B). CMBT (8.51) and FRO (8.49) have similar P/E ratio . CMBT YTD gains are higher at: 67.742 vs. FRO (62.938). CMBT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 883M vs. FRO (480M). FRO has less debt than CMBT: FRO (3.24B) vs CMBT (5.24B). CMBT has higher revenues than FRO: CMBT (1.95B) vs FRO (1.77B).
CMBTFROCMBT / FRO
Capitalization4.38B7.67B57%
EBITDA883M480M184%
Gain YTD67.74262.938108%
P/E Ratio8.518.49100%
Revenue1.95B1.77B110%
Total Cash147MN/A-
Total Debt5.24B3.24B162%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMBT vs FRO: Fundamental Ratings
CMBT
FRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8859
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5919
SMR RATING
1..100
4275
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1277
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMBT's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as FRO (14) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (59) in the null industry. This means that FRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRO (75) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRO’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FRO (41) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRO (77) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMBTFRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMBT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLYD54.981.73
+3.25%
MicroSectors™ Travel -3X Inv Lvgd ETNs
PAAA51.33-0.01
-0.01%
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
VSDB76.08-0.03
-0.03%
Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF
NXTG166.20-1.38
-0.82%
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
CVY28.61-0.36
-1.25%
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF

CMBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBT has been loosely correlated with TEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBT jumps, then TEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBT
1D Price
Change %
CMBT100%
+0.61%
TEN - CMBT
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
FRO - CMBT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
INSW - CMBT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
TNK - CMBT
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
DHT - CMBT
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More

FRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRO has been closely correlated with DHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRO jumps, then DHT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRO
1D Price
Change %
FRO100%
-0.63%
DHT - FRO
89%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
INSW - FRO
83%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
TEN - FRO
81%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
TNK - FRO
80%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
NAT - FRO
75%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
More