CMBT
Price
$9.39
Change
+$0.36 (+3.99%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.23B
56 days until earnings call
FRO
Price
$16.99
Change
+$0.58 (+3.53%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.33B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMBT vs FRO

Header iconCMBT vs FRO Comparison
Open Charts CMBT vs FROBanner chart's image
CMB.TECH
Price$9.39
Change+$0.36 (+3.99%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.23B
Frontline
Price$16.99
Change+$0.58 (+3.53%)
Volume$2.75M
Capitalization5.33B
CMBT vs FRO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMBT vs. FRO commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBT is a Hold and FRO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CMBT: $9.43 vs. FRO: $16.99)
Brand notoriety: CMBT: Notable vs. FRO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMBT: 57% vs. FRO: 97%
Market capitalization -- CMBT: $3.23B vs. FRO: $5.33B
CMBT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $3.23B. FRO’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $5.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $11.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRO is a better buy in the long-term than CMBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMBT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMBT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FRO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRO is a better buy in the short-term than CMBT.

Price Growth

CMBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +1.95% price change this week, while FRO (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -3.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

FRO is expected to report earnings on Aug 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.30% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRO($5.33B) has a higher market cap than CMBT($3.23B). FRO has higher P/E ratio than CMBT: FRO (6.80) vs CMBT (3.89). FRO YTD gains are higher at: 22.512 vs. CMBT (-5.035). CMBT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.05B vs. FRO (938M). CMBT has less debt than FRO: CMBT (1.79B) vs FRO (2.26B). FRO has higher revenues than CMBT: FRO (1.92B) vs CMBT (1.34B).
CMBTFROCMBT / FRO
Capitalization3.23B5.33B61%
EBITDA1.05B938M112%
Gain YTD-5.03522.512-22%
P/E Ratio3.896.8057%
Revenue1.34B1.92B70%
Total Cash160MN/A-
Total Debt1.79B2.26B79%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMBT vs FRO: Fundamental Ratings
CMBT
FRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5560
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
3755
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1732
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMBT's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FRO (17) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (100) in the null industry. This means that FRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FRO (55) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CMBT (62) in the null industry. This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as FRO (32) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMBTFRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDDVX20.95N/A
N/A
BlackRock Equity Dividend Inv A
NGUAX30.96N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Inv
GSSIX40.56N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Inst
HSFNX26.92N/A
N/A
Hennessy Small Cap Financial Investor
TACLX19.93N/A
N/A
Touchstone Large Cap A

CMBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBT has been loosely correlated with NVGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBT jumps, then NVGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBT
1D Price
Change %
CMBT100%
+4.43%
NVGS - CMBT
58%
Loosely correlated
+6.16%
TNK - CMBT
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.37%
INSW - CMBT
56%
Loosely correlated
+4.62%
DHT - CMBT
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
TRMD - CMBT
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
More

FRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRO has been closely correlated with DHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRO jumps, then DHT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRO
1D Price
Change %
FRO100%
+3.53%
DHT - FRO
89%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
INSW - FRO
82%
Closely correlated
+4.62%
TNK - FRO
81%
Closely correlated
+3.37%
STNG - FRO
79%
Closely correlated
+4.89%
TK - FRO
75%
Closely correlated
+3.71%
More