CMBT
Price
$9.27
Change
+$0.02 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.23B
63 days until earnings call
NVGS
Price
$14.72
Change
-$0.05 (-0.34%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.12B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMBT vs NVGS

Header iconCMBT vs NVGS Comparison
Open Charts CMBT vs NVGSBanner chart's image
CMB.TECH
Price$9.27
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.23B
NAVIGATOR HOLDINGS
Price$14.72
Change-$0.05 (-0.34%)
Volume$2.45K
Capitalization1.12B
CMBT vs NVGS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMBT vs. NVGS commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBT is a Buy and NVGS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CMBT: $9.25 vs. NVGS: $14.71)
Brand notoriety: CMBT: Notable vs. NVGS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMBT: 23% vs. NVGS: 121%
Market capitalization -- CMBT: $3.23B vs. NVGS: $1.12B
CMBT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $3.23B. NVGS’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNVGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NVGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMBT is a better buy in the long-term than NVGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMBT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMBT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NVGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NVGS is a better buy in the short-term than CMBT.

Price Growth

CMBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -2.12% price change this week, while NVGS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

NVGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-1.27% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBT($3.23B) has a higher market cap than NVGS($1.12B). NVGS has higher P/E ratio than CMBT: NVGS (14.04) vs CMBT (3.89). NVGS YTD gains are higher at: -3.485 vs. CMBT (-6.848). CMBT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.05B vs. NVGS (265M). CMBT has more cash in the bank: 160M vs. NVGS (150M). NVGS has less debt than CMBT: NVGS (857M) vs CMBT (1.79B). CMBT has higher revenues than NVGS: CMBT (1.34B) vs NVGS (551M).
CMBTNVGSCMBT / NVGS
Capitalization3.23B1.12B288%
EBITDA1.05B265M397%
Gain YTD-6.848-3.485197%
P/E Ratio3.8914.0428%
Revenue1.34B551M242%
Total Cash160M150M107%
Total Debt1.79B857M209%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMBT vs NVGS: Fundamental Ratings
CMBT
NVGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5720
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
3778
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1678
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMBT's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVGS (40) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVGS’s over the last 12 months.

NVGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (100) in the null industry. This means that NVGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVGS (78) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVGS’s over the last 12 months.

NVGS's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CMBT (61) in the null industry. This means that NVGS’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVGS (78) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMBTNVGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAFE26.110.30
+1.16%
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF
HDEF28.660.31
+1.09%
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Div Yld Eq ETF
LVHD39.540.22
+0.56%
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility Hi Div ETF
MUE9.490.05
+0.53%
Blackrock Muniholdings Quality Fund II
JHPI22.500.05
+0.21%
JHancock Preferred Income ETF

CMBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBT has been loosely correlated with NVGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBT jumps, then NVGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBT
1D Price
Change %
CMBT100%
N/A
NVGS - CMBT
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
TNK - CMBT
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
INSW - CMBT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
TRMD - CMBT
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
DHT - CMBT
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
More

NVGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVGS has been closely correlated with INSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NVGS jumps, then INSW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVGS
1D Price
Change %
NVGS100%
-0.41%
INSW - NVGS
71%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
STNG - NVGS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
LPG - NVGS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
TNK - NVGS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
DHT - NVGS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
More