CMC
Price
$72.13
Change
-$0.21 (-0.29%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.98B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WS
Price
$38.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.94B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMC vs WS

CMC vs WS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Commercial Metals Company (CMC) vs. Worthington Steel (WS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Commercial Metals Company (CMC) operates as a fully integrated steel manufacturer, recycler, and fabricator, while Worthington Steel (WS) functions as a value-added metals processor, giving each a distinct risk-and-return profile within the broader steel sector.
  • CMC has delivered a significantly stronger 1-year total return of approximately 34%, compared to roughly 15% for WS, reflecting divergent market sentiment and operational momentum.
  • CMC benefits from a massive balance sheet with nearly $1.9 billion in liquidity and a 244-quarter uninterrupted dividend streak, while WS is a younger standalone entity still navigating post-separation challenges and integrating recent acquisitions.
  • Both stocks have experienced pronounced pullbacks in recent weeks, yet CMC has rebounded more decisively, supported by insider buying from its CEO and improving steel product margins.
  • WS trades at a much lower forward P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio and offers a higher dividend yield, but its trailing-twelve-month earnings have contracted sharply, raising questions about near-term earnings visibility.
  • Investors seeking exposure to infrastructure-driven steel demand may find CMC's vertical integration appealing, while those focused on automotive and industrial end markets may gravitate toward WS's processing-centric model.

Introduction

Two names that often capture the attention of materials-sector investors are CMC (Commercial Metals Company) and WS (Worthington Steel). Although both operate within the steel value chain, they occupy meaningfully different roles — one as a vertically integrated manufacturer and recycler, the other as a specialty processor serving downstream industrial customers. This comparison is especially relevant for traders and investors attempting to navigate shifting interest rate expectations, evolving construction demand, and ongoing tariff dynamics. By examining relative performance, business models, and actionable data points, this article offers a structured, side-by-side view of how these two stocks are positioned in the current market environment.

CMC Overview and Recent Performance

CMC (Commercial Metals Company), headquartered in Irving, Texas, is a manufacturer, recycler, and fabricator of steel and metal products with operations spanning North America, Europe, and select international markets. The company operates through three segments: North America Steel Group, Europe Steel Group, and Emerging Businesses Group (EBG), the latter of which includes high-margin offerings such as Tensar geogrid solutions and performance reinforcing steel. With a market capitalization of approximately $7.6 billion and trailing-twelve-month revenue exceeding $8.9 billion, CMC is among the larger and more diversified players in the steel space.

In recent months, CMC stock has demonstrated notable resilience following a volatile stretch. After dipping toward the $60 level in early July 2026, shares rebounded to approximately $69 by late July, recovering much of the ground lost during a broader market pullback. The company's TAG (Transform, Advance, and Grow) operational excellence program has continued to exceed internal targets, contributing to margin expansion. Additionally, management has pursued a strategic expansion into precast concrete products via pending acquisitions of Foley Products Company and Concrete Pipe & Precast (CP&P), signaling an ambition to build a complementary growth platform beyond traditional steel. Notably, CEO Peter Matt purchased roughly $500,000 worth of CMC shares in mid-July 2026 — a transaction that drew attention from the investment community as a signal of executive confidence.

WS Overview and Recent Performance

WS (Worthington Steel), based in Columbus, Ohio, is a value-added metals processing company that transforms flat-rolled carbon steel, aluminum, and electrical steel into components for automotive, construction, heavy truck, agriculture, and energy customers. Unlike integrated steel producers, WS does not manufacture raw steel; instead, it processes steel purchased from mills through slitting, blanking, pickling, annealing, and other specialized techniques. The company became a standalone public entity in December 2023 following its separation from Worthington Enterprises. With a market capitalization near $1.8 billion and trailing-twelve-month revenue of roughly $3.4 billion, WS is considerably smaller than CMC but holds a distinct niche in downstream processing.

Recent market activity has been more challenging for WS. After reaching a 52-week high near $49 in February 2026, the stock declined steadily, falling below $32 in early July before stabilizing around the $36 level. The company's fiscal 2026 second-quarter results (reported in December 2025) showed an 18% year-over-year revenue increase to $872 million, driven partly by the Sitem Group acquisition, yet operating income remained modest at $21.7 million. On a trailing-twelve-month basis, net income has contracted sharply to approximately $8.5 million, reflecting margin pressure in the processing business and integration-related costs. The company maintains a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share and continues to invest in electrical steel capacity expansions in Mexico and Canada, positioning for longer-term demand in electric vehicle and energy infrastructure markets.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking an analytical edge beyond traditional research, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively scan thousands of tickers — including both CMC and WS — across multiple timeframes ranging from 5-minute to daily intervals. Not all bots make the cut: only those with the strongest real-time performance metrics and the highest suitability for current market conditions earn a spot in the Trending AI Robots section. Among the bots available on the platform, some have recorded annualized returns exceeding 100% and win rates above 65%, with profit factors reaching as high as 4.53 in select strategies. Each bot operates with its own defined trading style, strategy parameters, timeframe, and ticker universe — meaning users can explore approaches ranging from conservative swing trading to more active, high-frequency models. To discover which AI-driven strategies are currently leading, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most fundamental contrast between these two stocks lies in their business models. CMC is a vertically integrated operator that controls scrap recycling, steel melt shops, rolling mills, and downstream fabrication — giving it more direct exposure to steel pricing dynamics and scrap metal spreads. WS, by contrast, operates as an intermediary processor, purchasing steel from mills and adding value through precision processing. This makes WS more sensitive to volume trends in end markets like automotive and heavy truck, while CMC's earnings are more closely tied to construction cycles and infrastructure spending.

From a valuation standpoint, the divergence is stark. CMC trades at a trailing P/E of roughly 13 and a forward P/E near 11, while WS carries a trailing P/E above 105 — reflecting its heavily compressed recent earnings — but a forward P/E of approximately 14, suggesting analysts expect a significant earnings recovery. On the dividend front, WS offers a higher yield at roughly 1.8% compared to CMC's 1.2%, though CMC's payout is backed by 244 consecutive quarterly dividends and a far larger cash reserve.

Risk profiles also differ meaningfully. WS carries a beta of 2.32, making it substantially more volatile than CMC (beta of 1.53). Meanwhile, CMC faces ongoing legal overhang from the Pacific Steel Group litigation, which resulted in a significant after-tax charge in fiscal 2025, although the company is pursuing appeals. WS's key risk is execution around the Sitem Group integration and the pace of recovery in automotive and industrial end markets.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative earnings momentum, and balance sheet quality, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely favor CMC in the current market environment. The stock's stronger 1-year return trajectory, coupled with recovering steel product margins and CEO insider buying, points to a more established positive trend. CMC's diversified segment structure — spanning North American steel, European operations, and a growing emerging businesses portfolio — provides multiple avenues for earnings growth, while its nearly $1.9 billion liquidity position offers substantial downside cushion. WS presents a more uncertain near-term picture: while its forward valuation appears attractive and the Sitem acquisition expands its global footprint, the sharp contraction in trailing earnings and elevated volatility introduce greater probabilistic risk. The AI verdict is not a definitive prediction but rather a probabilistic read: CMC currently exhibits a more favorable combination of trend stability, catalyst visibility, and financial resilience.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CMC vs. WS commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMC is a StrongBuy and WS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CMC: $72.13 vs. WS: $38.04)
Brand notoriety: CMC and WS are both not notable
CMC represents the Metal Fabrication, while WS is part of the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMC: 58% vs. WS: 39%
Market capitalization -- CMC: $7.98B vs. WS: $1.94B
CMC [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $7.98B. WS’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $1.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $61.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $5.46B. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $11.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMC is a better buy in the long-term than WS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WS is a better buy in the short-term than CMC.

Price Growth

CMC (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -2.12% price change this week, while WS (@Steel) price change was +2.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.31%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +4.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMC is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

WS is expected to report earnings on Sep 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (+0.30% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

@Steel (+4.29% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMC($7.98B) has a higher market cap than WS($1.94B). WS has higher P/E ratio than CMC: WS (223.76) vs CMC (13.64). WS YTD gains are higher at: 10.827 vs. CMC (5.132). CMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. WS (120M). CMC has more cash in the bank: 560M vs. WS (84.6M). WS has less debt than CMC: WS (354M) vs CMC (3.4B). CMC has higher revenues than WS: CMC (8.85B) vs WS (3.44B).
CMCWSCMC / WS
Capitalization7.98B1.94B412%
EBITDA1.15B120M957%
Gain YTD5.13210.82747%
P/E Ratio13.64223.766%
Revenue8.85B3.44B257%
Total Cash560M84.6M662%
Total Debt3.4B354M960%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMC: Fundamental Ratings
CMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
33
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMCWS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISVL54.030.47
+0.89%
iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF
YFFI9.910.05
+0.46%
Indexperts Yield Focused Fxd Inc ETF
IGOV41.290.10
+0.24%
iShares International Treasury Bond ETF
GCV4.73N/A
N/A
Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund (The)
BTCC12.79-0.29
-2.20%
Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF

CMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMC has been closely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMC jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMC
1D Price
Change %
CMC100%
-0.29%
STLD - CMC
73%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
RS - CMC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
NUE - CMC
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
MTUS - CMC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
WS - CMC
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

WS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WS has been loosely correlated with CMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WS jumps, then CMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WS
1D Price
Change %
WS100%
N/A
CMC - WS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
RS - WS
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
MTUS - WS
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
NUE - WS
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
MT - WS
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
More