Ad is loading...
CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMCCX vs FSMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd C
Price$12.32
Change+$0.07 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$77.78
Change+$0.62 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. CMCCX (1.41B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMCCX: FSMAX (0.53) vs CMCCX (0.00). CMCCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMCCX (22 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CMCCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 174.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs CMCCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.35 vs. CMCCX (-16.89). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.85 vs. CMCCX (-24.75).
| CMCCX | FSMAX | CMCCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.04 | 5,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.04 | 5,429% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.489 | -15.097 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 36.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.89 | 0.35 | -4,767% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.06 | 5.53 | -128% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.75 | 60.85 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -53.72 | 44.71 | -120% |