Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMCCX vs FSMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd C
Price$16.37
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.86B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$99.49
Change+$1.11 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. CMCCX (1.86B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMCCX: FSMAX (0.44) vs CMCCX (0.00). CMCCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMCCX (22 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CMCCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 174.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs CMCCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.86 vs. CMCCX (10.17). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.29 vs. CMCCX (-18.57).
| CMCCX | FSMAX | CMCCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.04 | 5,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.04 | 5,429% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.537 | 9.474 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 41B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.17 | 20.86 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.64 | 56.06 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.57 | 58.29 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.02 | 100.64 | -36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement