Ad is loading...
CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMCCX vs FSMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd C
Price$13.64
Change-$0.06 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$85.11
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCCX vs. FSMAX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. CMCCX (1.56B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMCCX: FSMAX (0.54) vs CMCCX (0.00). CMCCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMCCX (22 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CMCCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 174.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs CMCCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.85 vs. CMCCX (-9.49). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.38 vs. CMCCX (-20.47).
| CMCCX | FSMAX | CMCCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.04 | 5,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.04 | 5,429% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.672 | -6.349 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 36B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.49 | 4.85 | -196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.11 | 34.86 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.47 | 63.38 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.45 | 62.32 | -78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...