Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CMCCX (2.29B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMCCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CMCCX (0.00). CMCCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMCCX (23 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMCCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs CMCCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.47 vs. CMCCX (4.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. CMCCX (-27.23).
| CMCCX | FSMAX | CMCCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.04 | 5,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.04 | 5,371% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.658 | 15.556 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 42.7B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.02 | 30.47 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.94 | 74.03 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.23 | 35.19 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.00 | 153.75 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers