Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CMCCX (2.31B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMCCX: FSMAX (0.49) vs CMCCX (0.00). CMCCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMCCX (23 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMCCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs CMCCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.66 vs. CMCCX (-9.35). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.06 vs. CMCCX (-37.03).
| CMCCX | FSMAX | CMCCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.04 | 5,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.04 | 5,371% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.466 | 16.609 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 40.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.35 | 18.66 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.84 | 67.21 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.03 | 33.06 | -112% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.28 | 132.46 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers