Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCCX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CMCCX (2.34B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMCCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CMCCX (0.00). CMCCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMCCX (23 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMCCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs CMCCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.69 vs. CMCCX (-3.45). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.70 vs. CMCCX (-29.51).
| CMCCX | FSMAX | CMCCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.04 | 5,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.04 | 5,371% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.046 | 20.115 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 40.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.45 | 25.69 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.22 | 73.94 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.51 | 40.70 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.43 | 143.59 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement