Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCIX vs NRGSX
CMCIX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CMCIX vs NRGSX
CMCIX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCIX vs. NRGSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCIX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.49B vs. CMCIX (199M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CMCIX: NRGSX (0.47) vs CMCIX (0.16). CMCIX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CMCIX (15 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CMCIX (0.92) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CMCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCIX: NRGSX (0) vs CMCIX (1000000). CMCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.02 vs. NRGSX (-3.03). CMCIX return over 5 years is better than : -15.60 vs. NRGSX (-20.50).
| CMCIX | NRGSX | CMCIX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.74 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.74 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.181 | 9.900 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 199M | 7.49B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.47 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.02 | -3.03 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.63 | 1.88 | 407% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.60 | -20.50 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.12 | 14.17 | 234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement