Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCIX vs NRGSX
CMCIX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CMCIX vs NRGSX
CMCIX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCIX vs. NRGSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCIX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. CMCIX (206M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CMCIX: NRGSX (0.45) vs CMCIX (0.15). CMCIX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CMCIX (15 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CMCIX (0.92) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CMCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCIX: NRGSX (0) vs CMCIX (1000000). CMCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.46 vs. NRGSX (-1.20). CMCIX return over 5 years is better than : -11.98 vs. NRGSX (-18.93).
| CMCIX | NRGSX | CMCIX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.74 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.74 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.169 | 16.543 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 206M | 7.39B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.45 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.46 | -1.20 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.75 | 7.14 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.98 | -18.93 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.92 | 12.86 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers