CMCL
Price
$18.39
Change
-$0.48 (-2.54%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
355.17M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSM
Price
$8.43
Change
-$0.34 (-3.88%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.55B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMCL vs FSM

CMCL vs FSM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMCL vs. FSM commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCL is a Buy and FSM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CMCL: $18.39 vs. FSM: $8.43)
Brand notoriety: CMCL and FSM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMCL: 68% vs. FSM: 83%
Market capitalization -- CMCL: $355.17M vs. FSM: $2.55B
CMCL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $355.17M. FSM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $9.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMCL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMCL is a better buy in the long-term than FSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMCL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMCL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FSM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMCL and FSM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMCL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.45% price change this week, while FSM (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -26.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMCL is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

FSM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-1.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSM($2.55B) has a higher market cap than CMCL($355M). FSM has higher P/E ratio than CMCL: FSM (7.81) vs CMCL (5.78). FSM YTD gains are higher at: -14.067 vs. CMCL (-28.877). FSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 743M vs. CMCL (122M). FSM has more cash in the bank: 676M vs. CMCL (170M). CMCL has less debt than FSM: CMCL (116M) vs FSM (209M). FSM has higher revenues than CMCL: FSM (1.09B) vs CMCL (278M).
CMCLFSMCMCL / FSM
Capitalization355M2.55B14%
EBITDA122M743M16%
Gain YTD-28.877-14.067205%
P/E Ratio5.787.8174%
Revenue278M1.09B25%
Total Cash170M676M25%
Total Debt116M209M56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMCL vs FSM: Fundamental Ratings
CMCL
FSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7369
SMR RATING
1..100
3945
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9987
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMCL's Valuation (6) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSM (54) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CMCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CMCL (73) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to CMCL’s over the last 12 months.

CMCL's SMR Rating (39) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as FSM (45) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CMCL’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CMCL (73) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to CMCL’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CMCL (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to CMCL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMCLFSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMCL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHE154.540.57
+0.37%
Stt Strt® SPDR® MSCI USA Gndr Divst ETF
IYG95.520.06
+0.06%
iShares US Financial Services ETF
IBIJ25.21-0.05
-0.21%
iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term Tips ETF
CORB29.04-0.08
-0.27%
AB Core Bond ETF
BUFI42.81-0.26
-0.60%
AB International Buffer ETF

CMCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMCL has been loosely correlated with FSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMCL jumps, then FSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMCL
1D Price
Change %
CMCL100%
-2.54%
FSM - CMCL
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.88%
PAAS - CMCL
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
AGI - CMCL
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
KGC - CMCL
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
WPM - CMCL
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.84%
More

FSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSM
1D Price
Change %
FSM100%
-3.88%
WPM - FSM
83%
Closely correlated
-3.84%
PAAS - FSM
82%
Closely correlated
-2.09%
AEM - FSM
82%
Closely correlated
-3.64%
KGC - FSM
82%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
IAG - FSM
81%
Closely correlated
-2.54%
More