CMEIF vs VRM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMEIF is a Hold and VRM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMEIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileVRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CMEIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- VRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
VRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- VRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CMEIF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VRM (@Specialty Stores) price change was -44.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
VRM is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-2.18% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| CMEIF | VRM | CMEIF / VRM | |
| Capitalization | 1.47B | 24.1M | 6,104% |
| EBITDA | 1.62B | -276M | -587% |
| Gain YTD | -40.000 | -89.668 | 45% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.66 | 13.28 | 156% |
| Revenue | 24.4B | 893M | 2,732% |
| Total Cash | 3.5B | 140M | 2,497% |
| Total Debt | 5.54B | 1.23B | 449% |
| VRM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
CMEIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CMEIF and CZASF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMEIF and CZASF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMEIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMEIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CZASF - CMEIF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FKRAF - CMEIF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| CDNAF - CMEIF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| VRM - CMEIF | 3% Poorly correlated | -24.09% | ||
| ANCTF - CMEIF | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.02% | ||
More | ||||
VRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRM has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRM jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRM | 100% | -24.09% | ||
| HNST - VRM | 41% Loosely correlated | +6.31% | ||
| CPRT - VRM | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| CVNA - VRM | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
| LE - VRM | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.41% | ||
| LOW - VRM | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||