Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMFCX vs LTUCX
CMFCX vs LTUCX Comparison
Open Charts CMFCX vs LTUCX
CMFCX vs LTUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMFCX vs. LTUCX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMFCX is a Hold and LTUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMFCX has more cash in the bank: 13.1B vs. LTUCX (76.9M). CMFCX pays higher dividends than LTUCX: CMFCX (3.35) vs LTUCX (2.37). CMFCX was incepted earlier than LTUCX: CMFCX (16 years) vs LTUCX (32 years). LTUCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than CMFCX (1.48). CMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. LTUCX (22.17). CMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTUCX: CMFCX (250) vs LTUCX (5000). CMFCX (3.73) and LTUCX (3.57) have marching annual gain over last year. LTUCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.14 vs. CMFCX (-3.06).
| CMFCX | LTUCX | CMFCX / LTUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.17 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.98 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.809 | 0.159 | -509% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 76.9M | 17,035% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.35 | 2.37 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.73 | 3.57 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.68 | 10.99 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.06 | 2.14 | -143% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.69 | 7.36 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers