Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMFCX vs LTUCX
CMFCX vs LTUCX Comparison
Open Charts CMFCX vs LTUCX
CMFCX vs LTUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMFCX vs. LTUCX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMFCX is a Hold and LTUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMFCX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. LTUCX (74M). CMFCX pays higher dividends than LTUCX: CMFCX (3.29) vs LTUCX (2.37). CMFCX was incepted earlier than LTUCX: CMFCX (16 years) vs LTUCX (32 years). LTUCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than CMFCX (1.48). CMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. LTUCX (22.17). CMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTUCX: CMFCX (250) vs LTUCX (1000). LTUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.37 vs. CMFCX (-2.22). LTUCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.79 vs. CMFCX (-5.39).
| CMFCX | LTUCX | CMFCX / LTUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.17 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.98 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.090 | -1.088 | 284% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 74M | 17,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 2.37 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.22 | -0.37 | 599% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.94 | 10.91 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.39 | 0.79 | -681% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.08 | 6.08 | -51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers