Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMFCX vs LTUGX
CMFCX vs LTUGX Comparison
Open Charts CMFCX vs LTUGX
CMFCX vs LTUGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMFCX vs. LTUGX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMFCX is a Hold and LTUGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMFCX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. LTUGX (74M). CMFCX pays higher dividends than LTUGX: CMFCX (3.29) vs LTUGX (2.75). CMFCX was incepted earlier than LTUGX: CMFCX (16 years) vs LTUGX (13 years). LTUGX (2.29) is less costly to investors than CMFCX (1.48). CMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. LTUGX (22.17). LTUGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMFCX: LTUGX (0) vs CMFCX (250). LTUGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.07 vs. CMFCX (-2.22). LTUGX return over 5 years is better than : 2.22 vs. CMFCX (-5.39).
| CMFCX | LTUGX | CMFCX / LTUGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.92 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.29 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.090 | -0.814 | 380% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 74M | 17,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 2.75 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.22 | 0.07 | -3,109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.94 | 11.91 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.39 | 2.22 | -243% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.08 | 8.82 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers