Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMFCX vs LTUQX
CMFCX vs LTUQX Comparison
Open Charts CMFCX vs LTUQX
CMFCX vs LTUQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMFCX vs. LTUQX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMFCX is a Hold and LTUQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMFCX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. LTUQX (75.9M). CMFCX pays higher dividends than LTUQX: CMFCX (3.34) vs LTUQX (2.41). CMFCX was incepted earlier than LTUQX: CMFCX (16 years) vs LTUQX (6 years). LTUQX (3.52) is less costly to investors than CMFCX (1.48). CMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. LTUQX (22.17). CMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTUQX: CMFCX (250) vs LTUQX (5000). LTUQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.40 vs. CMFCX (1.53). LTUQX return over 5 years is better than : 2.06 vs. CMFCX (-3.72).
| CMFCX | LTUQX | CMFCX / LTUQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.32 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 3.52 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.484 | 0.136 | -1,089% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 75.9M | 17,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.34 | 2.41 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.53 | 2.40 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.59 | 12.77 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.72 | 2.06 | -181% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement