Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMFCX vs RGVAX
CMFCX vs RGVAX Comparison
Open Charts CMFCX vs RGVAX
CMFCX vs RGVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMFCX vs. RGVAX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMFCX is a Hold and RGVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVAX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. CMFCX (13.1B). CMFCX (3.35) and RGVAX (3.31) have matching dividends . CMFCX was incepted earlier than RGVAX: CMFCX (16 years) vs RGVAX (24 years). CMFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGVAX (1.33). CMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVAX (50.00). CMFCX (250) and RGVAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.73 vs. RGVAX (2.79). CMFCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.06 vs. RGVAX (-4.86).
| CMFCX | RGVAX | CMFCX / RGVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.33 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.33 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.809 | -1.039 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 24.3B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.35 | 3.31 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.73 | 2.79 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.68 | 7.76 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.06 | -4.86 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.69 | -1.83 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers