Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMFCX vs RGVAX
CMFCX vs RGVAX Comparison
Open Charts CMFCX vs RGVAX
CMFCX vs RGVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMFCX vs. RGVAX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMFCX is a Hold and RGVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVAX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. CMFCX (12.9B). RGVAX (3.31) and CMFCX (3.29) have matching dividends . CMFCX was incepted earlier than RGVAX: CMFCX (16 years) vs RGVAX (24 years). CMFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGVAX (1.33). CMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVAX (50.00). CMFCX (250) and RGVAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.95 vs. RGVAX (-1.42). CMFCX return over 5 years is better than : -4.38 vs. RGVAX (-6.25).
| CMFCX | RGVAX | CMFCX / RGVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.33 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.33 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.050 | -2.153 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 24B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 3.31 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.95 | -1.42 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.72 | 8.72 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.38 | -6.25 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.85 | -2.45 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers