Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMFCX vs RGVAX
CMFCX vs RGVAX Comparison
Open Charts CMFCX vs RGVAX
CMFCX vs RGVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMFCX vs. RGVAX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMFCX is a Hold and RGVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVAX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. CMFCX (13B). RGVAX (3.36) and CMFCX (3.34) have matching dividends . CMFCX was incepted earlier than RGVAX: CMFCX (16 years) vs RGVAX (24 years). CMFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGVAX (1.33). CMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVAX (50.00). CMFCX (250) and RGVAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.65 vs. RGVAX (0.90). CMFCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.71 vs. RGVAX (-5.69).
| CMFCX | RGVAX | CMFCX / RGVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.33 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.33 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.368 | -1.609 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 23.7B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.34 | 3.36 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.65 | 0.90 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.93 | 9.80 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.71 | -5.69 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.07 | -2.06 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers