Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMFCX vs RGVCX
CMFCX vs RGVCX Comparison
Open Charts CMFCX vs RGVCX
CMFCX vs RGVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMFCX vs. RGVCX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMFCX is a Hold and RGVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. CMFCX (13.1B). RGVCX pays higher dividends than CMFCX: RGVCX (3.74) vs CMFCX (3.38). CMFCX was incepted earlier than RGVCX: CMFCX (16 years) vs RGVCX (24 years). CMFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGVCX (0.89). CMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVCX (50.00). CMFCX (250) and RGVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.01 vs. RGVCX (3.68). RGVCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.82 vs. CMFCX (-2.55).
| CMFCX | RGVCX | CMFCX / RGVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.89 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.89 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.484 | -0.462 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 24.3B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.38 | 3.74 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.01 | 3.68 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.48 | 8.93 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.55 | -1.82 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.26 | 2.93 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers