Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMFEX vs LTUSX
CMFEX vs LTUSX Comparison
Open Charts CMFEX vs LTUSX
CMFEX vs LTUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMFEX vs. LTUSX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMFEX is a Hold and LTUSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMFEX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. LTUSX (74M). CMFEX pays higher dividends than LTUSX: CMFEX (3.86) vs LTUSX (2.74). CMFEX was incepted earlier than LTUSX: CMFEX (16 years) vs LTUSX (39 years). LTUSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than CMFEX (0.92). CMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. LTUSX (22.17). CMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTUSX: CMFEX (250) vs LTUSX (1000). LTUSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.06 vs. CMFEX (-1.61). LTUSX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. CMFEX (-2.68).
| CMFEX | LTUSX | CMFEX / LTUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.92 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.05 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.672 | -0.740 | 361% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 74M | 17,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.86 | 2.74 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.61 | 0.06 | -2,531% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.85 | 11.89 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.68 | 2.34 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.59 | 9.54 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement