Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMFFX vs GVTFX
CMFFX vs GVTFX Comparison
Open Charts CMFFX vs GVTFX
CMFFX vs GVTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMFFX vs. GVTFX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMFFX is a Hold and GVTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GVTFX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. CMFFX (13.1B). CMFFX (4.44) and GVTFX (4.28) have matching dividends . CMFFX was incepted earlier than GVTFX: CMFFX (16 years) vs GVTFX (18 years). CMFFX (0.68) is less costly to investors than GVTFX (0.36). CMFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GVTFX (50.00). CMFFX (250) and GVTFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CMFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. GVTFX (3.71). CMFFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.58 vs. GVTFX (0.76).
| CMFFX | GVTFX | CMFFX / GVTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.36 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.36 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.144 | -0.408 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 24.3B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.44 | 4.28 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | 3.71 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.68 | 11.25 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.58 | 0.76 | 340% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.66 | 8.71 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers