Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMFFX vs RGVBX
CMFFX vs RGVBX Comparison
Open Charts CMFFX vs RGVBX
CMFFX vs RGVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMFFX vs. RGVBX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMFFX is a Hold and RGVBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVBX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. CMFFX (13.1B). CMFFX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: CMFFX (4.44) vs RGVBX (3.30). CMFFX was incepted earlier than RGVBX: CMFFX (16 years) vs RGVBX (24 years). RGVBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CMFFX (0.68). CMFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVBX (50.00). CMFFX (250) and RGVBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CMFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. RGVBX (2.71). CMFFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.58 vs. RGVBX (-4.07).
| CMFFX | RGVBX | CMFFX / RGVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.32 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.32 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.144 | -0.823 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 24.3B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.44 | 3.30 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | 2.71 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.68 | 8.04 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.58 | -4.07 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.66 | -1.44 | -742% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers