Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMGIX vs FSMAX
CMGIX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMGIX vs FSMAX
CMGIX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMGIX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMGIX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. CMGIX (5.4B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMGIX: FSMAX (0.48) vs CMGIX (0.00). CMGIX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMGIX (30 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMGIX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMGIX: FSMAX (0) vs CMGIX (2000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.71 vs. CMGIX (-10.39). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.19 vs. CMGIX (-13.01).
| CMGIX | FSMAX | CMGIX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.04 | 2,286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.04 | 2,371% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.510 | 15.437 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.4B | 43.5B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.39 | 23.71 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.39 | 61.06 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.01 | 40.19 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.21 | 137.72 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers