Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMGIX vs FSMAX
CMGIX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMGIX vs FSMAX
CMGIX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMGIX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMGIX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CMGIX (5.49B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMGIX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CMGIX (0.00). CMGIX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMGIX (29 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMGIX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMGIX: FSMAX (0) vs CMGIX (2000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.79 vs. CMGIX (-9.45). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.31 vs. CMGIX (-15.53).
| CMGIX | FSMAX | CMGIX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.04 | 2,286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.04 | 2,371% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.540 | 13.658 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.49B | 42.7B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.45 | 28.79 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.03 | 66.13 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.53 | 36.31 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.03 | 145.49 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement