Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMGSX vs FSMAX
CMGSX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMGSX vs FSMAX
CMGSX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMGSX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMGSX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CMGSX (5.07B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMGSX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CMGSX (0.00). CMGSX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMGSX (30 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMGSX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMGSX: FSMAX (0) vs CMGSX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. CMGSX (-26.14). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. CMGSX (-34.29).
| CMGSX | FSMAX | CMGSX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.04 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.04 | 3,257% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.461 | 13.370 | -71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.07B | 40.1B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.14 | 20.57 | -127% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.65 | 55.83 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.29 | 33.18 | -103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.81 | 133.82 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers