Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMGSX vs FSMAX
CMGSX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMGSX vs FSMAX
CMGSX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMGSX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMGSX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CMGSX (4.62B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMGSX: FSMAX (0.49) vs CMGSX (0.00). CMGSX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMGSX (30 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMGSX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMGSX: FSMAX (0) vs CMGSX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. CMGSX (-30.98). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. CMGSX (-40.34).
| CMGSX | FSMAX | CMGSX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.04 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.04 | 3,257% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.919 | 13.370 | -104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.62B | 40.1B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -30.98 | 13.05 | -237% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.17 | 63.92 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.34 | 32.77 | -123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.02 | 133.42 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement