Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMGSX vs FSMAX
CMGSX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMGSX vs FSMAX
CMGSX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMGSX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMGSX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CMGSX (5.61B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMGSX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CMGSX (0.00). CMGSX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMGSX (30 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMGSX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMGSX: FSMAX (0) vs CMGSX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. CMGSX (-10.25). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. CMGSX (-19.00).
| CMGSX | FSMAX | CMGSX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.04 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.04 | 3,257% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.546 | 15.427 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 42.7B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.25 | 29.23 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.60 | 73.83 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.00 | 33.65 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.64 | 153.47 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement