Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMGSX vs FSMAX
CMGSX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMGSX vs FSMAX
CMGSX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMGSX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMGSX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CMGSX (5.07B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMGSX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CMGSX (0.00). CMGSX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMGSX (30 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMGSX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMGSX: FSMAX (0) vs CMGSX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. CMGSX (-22.08). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. CMGSX (-32.46).
| CMGSX | FSMAX | CMGSX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.04 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.04 | 3,257% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.441 | 16.937 | -44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.07B | 40.1B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.08 | 23.68 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.87 | 72.74 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.46 | 40.14 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.15 | 134.49 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement