Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMGVX vs FSMAX
CMGVX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMGVX vs FSMAX
CMGVX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMGVX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMGVX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CMGVX (2.29B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMGVX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CMGVX (0.00). CMGVX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMGVX (15 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMGVX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). CMGVX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. CMGVX (6.46). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. CMGVX (-1.42).
| CMGVX | FSMAX | CMGVX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.04 | 2,371% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.04 | 2,371% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.584 | 16.937 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 40.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.46 | 23.68 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.80 | 72.74 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.42 | 40.14 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.00 | 134.49 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers