Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMGVX vs FSMAX
CMGVX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMGVX vs FSMAX
CMGVX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMGVX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMGVX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CMGVX (2.3B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMGVX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CMGVX (0.00). CMGVX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMGVX (15 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMGVX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). CMGVX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. CMGVX (16.30). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. CMGVX (3.52).
| CMGVX | FSMAX | CMGVX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.04 | 2,371% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.04 | 2,371% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.253 | 15.427 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 42.7B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.30 | 29.23 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.34 | 73.83 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.52 | 33.65 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.67 | 153.47 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers