Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMGVX vs FSMAX
CMGVX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMGVX vs FSMAX
CMGVX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMGVX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMGVX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. CMGVX (2.26B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMGVX: FSMAX (0.48) vs CMGVX (0.00). CMGVX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMGVX (15 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMGVX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). CMGVX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. CMGVX (10.17). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. CMGVX (1.33).
| CMGVX | FSMAX | CMGVX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.04 | 2,371% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.04 | 2,371% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.865 | 15.913 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 43.5B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.17 | 24.38 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.42 | 63.28 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.33 | 39.12 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.44 | 139.20 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers