Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMIDX vs FSMAX
CMIDX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMIDX vs FSMAX
CMIDX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMIDX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMIDX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CMIDX (372M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMIDX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CMIDX (0.00). CMIDX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMIDX (14 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CMIDX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMIDX: FSMAX (0) vs CMIDX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. CMIDX (-1.62). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. CMIDX (-37.85).
| CMIDX | FSMAX | CMIDX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.04 | 3,086% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.04 | 3,086% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.074 | 16.937 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 372M | 40.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.62 | 23.68 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.31 | 72.74 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.85 | 40.14 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.21 | 134.49 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement