Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMJAX vs FSMDX
CMJAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts CMJAX vs FSMDX
CMJAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMJAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMJAX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. CMJAX (482M). FSMDX (0.99) and CMJAX (0.97) have matching dividends . CMJAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: CMJAX (11 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). CMJAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). CMJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMJAX: FSMDX (0) vs CMJAX (5000). CMJAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.82 vs. FSMDX (22.60). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. CMJAX (34.97).
| CMJAX | FSMDX | CMJAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.03 | 1,960% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.03 | 2,600% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.899 | 14.027 | 120% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 482M | 51.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.99 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.82 | 22.60 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.88 | 60.71 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.97 | 43.56 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.91 | 179.66 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement