Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLCX vs RMEBX
CMLCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CMLCX vs RMEBX
CMLCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMLCX (118B) and RMEBX (118B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RMEBX pays higher dividends than CMLCX: RMEBX (1.00) vs CMLCX (0.73). CMLCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CMLCX (24 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). CMLCX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). CMLCX (30.00) and RMEBX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. CMLCX (250) and RMEBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. CMLCX (6.53). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.24 vs. CMLCX (33.11).
| CMLCX | RMEBX | CMLCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.07 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.07 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.348 | 8.533 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 118B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.00 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.53 | 6.88 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.63 | 30.86 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.11 | 35.24 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.05 | 88.54 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement