Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLFX vs RMEBX
CMLFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CMLFX vs RMEBX
CMLFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMLFX (117B) and RMEBX (117B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CMLFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CMLFX (1.60) vs RMEBX (1.04). CMLFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CMLFX (24 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CMLFX (0.69). CMLFX (30.00) and RMEBX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. CMLFX (250) and RMEBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CMLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.87 vs. RMEBX (9.16). CMLFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.10 vs. RMEBX (33.79).
| CMLFX | RMEBX | CMLFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.177 | 6.885 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 117B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.04 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.87 | 9.16 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.54 | 33.97 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.10 | 33.79 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.40 | 92.81 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement