Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs RGAFX
CMLIX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs RGAFX
CMLIX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CMLIX (590M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: RGAFX (0.46) vs CMLIX (0.00). CMLIX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: CMLIX (98 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). CMLIX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CMLIX (22.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: RGAFX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). CMLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.50 vs. RGAFX (4.67). RGAFX (17.46) and CMLIX (17.38) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CMLIX | RGAFX | CMLIX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.34 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.34 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 98 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.016 | 7.299 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 590M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.50 | 4.67 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.39 | 40.73 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.38 | 17.46 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.05 | 105.95 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement