Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs RGAFX
CMLIX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs RGAFX
CMLIX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CMLIX (591M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: RGAFX (0.46) vs CMLIX (0.00). CMLIX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: CMLIX (98 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). CMLIX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CMLIX (22.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: RGAFX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.49 vs. CMLIX (10.88). CMLIX return over 5 years is better than : 22.18 vs. RGAFX (20.71).
| CMLIX | RGAFX | CMLIX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.34 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.34 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 98 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.833 | 8.854 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 591M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.88 | 12.49 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.35 | 50.06 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.18 | 20.71 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.42 | 121.55 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement