Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNIX vs QDARX
CMNIX vs QDARX Comparison
Open Charts CMNIX vs QDARX
CMNIX vs QDARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNIX vs. QDARX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNIX is a Buy and QDARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNIX has more cash in the bank: 18B vs. QDARX (2.65B). QDARX pays higher dividends than CMNIX: QDARX (2.15) vs CMNIX (1.70). CMNIX was incepted earlier than QDARX: CMNIX (26 years) vs QDARX (12 years). QDARX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CMNIX (1.01). QDARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 410.00 vs. CMNIX (43.00). CMNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than QDARX: CMNIX (1000000) vs QDARX (50000000). QDARX (6.65) and CMNIX (6.65) have marching annual gain over last year. CMNIX return over 5 years is better than : 20.94 vs. QDARX (16.28).
| CMNIX | QDARX | CMNIX / QDARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.66 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.66 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.770 | 3.357 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 50000000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18B | 2.65B | 679% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 2.15 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.65 | 6.65 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.27 | 19.73 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.94 | 16.28 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.67 | 96.67 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement