CMOPF
Price
$75.00
Change
-$4.09 (-5.17%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
NVS
Price
$129.73
Change
+$1.31 (+1.02%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
250.37B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMOPF vs NVS

Header iconCMOPF vs NVS Comparison
Open Charts CMOPF vs NVSBanner chart's image
Cosmo Pharmaceuticals
Price$75.00
Change-$4.09 (-5.17%)
Volume$50
Capitalization1.3B
Novartis AG
Price$129.73
Change+$1.31 (+1.02%)
Volume$1.34M
Capitalization250.37B
CMOPF vs NVS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMOPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMOPF vs. NVS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMOPF is a Hold and NVS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CMOPF: $75.00 vs. NVS: $129.73)
Brand notoriety: CMOPF and NVS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMOPF: 26% vs. NVS: 84%
Market capitalization -- CMOPF: $1.3B vs. NVS: $250.37B
CMOPF [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $1.3B. NVS’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $250.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $651.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $90.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMOPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNVS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMOPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NVS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NVS is a better buy in the long-term than CMOPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMOPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMOPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NVS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NVS is a better buy in the short-term than CMOPF.

Price Growth

CMOPF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NVS (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was +2.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

NVS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (+1.16% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NVS($250B) has a higher market cap than CMOPF($1.3B). NVS (18.72) and CMOPF (18.02) have similar P/E ratio . NVS YTD gains are higher at: 38.116 vs. CMOPF (12.065). NVS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.7B vs. CMOPF (84.7M). NVS has more cash in the bank: 7B vs. CMOPF (127M). CMOPF has less debt than NVS: CMOPF (2.7M) vs NVS (32.6B). NVS has higher revenues than CMOPF: NVS (55.2B) vs CMOPF (182M).
CMOPFNVSCMOPF / NVS
Capitalization1.3B250B1%
EBITDA84.7M22.7B0%
Gain YTD12.06538.11632%
P/E Ratio18.0218.7296%
Revenue182M55.2B0%
Total Cash127M7B2%
Total Debt2.7M32.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMOPF vs NVS: Fundamental Ratings
CMOPF
NVS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4528
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10011
SMR RATING
1..100
6129
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6280
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMOPF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as NVS (15) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that CMOPF’s stock grew similarly to NVS’s over the last 12 months.

NVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMOPF (100) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew significantly faster than CMOPF’s over the last 12 months.

NVS's SMR Rating (29) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as CMOPF (61) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew similarly to CMOPF’s over the last 12 months.

NVS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as CMOPF (56) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew similarly to CMOPF’s over the last 12 months.

CMOPF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as NVS (80) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that CMOPF’s stock grew similarly to NVS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMOPFNVS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMOPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSTCX61.60N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Port
MDDCX26.04N/A
N/A
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv A
LCEYX19.67N/A
N/A
Invesco Diversified Dividend Y
MEIRX8.17N/A
N/A
MassMutual International Eq R4
REGRX19.35N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Emerging Markets R6

CMOPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMOPF and GSK have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMOPF and GSK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMOPF
1D Price
Change %
CMOPF100%
N/A
GSK - CMOPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
NVS - CMOPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
CHGCY - CMOPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
DSNKY - CMOPF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
CSPCY - CMOPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More

NVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVS has been closely correlated with GSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NVS jumps, then GSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVS
1D Price
Change %
NVS100%
+1.02%
GSK - NVS
68%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
AZN - NVS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
PFE - NVS
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
JNJ - NVS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
SNY - NVS
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.58%
More