Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMPCX vs TRQZX
CMPCX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts CMPCX vs TRQZX
CMPCX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMPCX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPCX is a Buy and TRQZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. CMPCX (199M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than CMPCX: TRQZX (0.72) vs CMPCX (0.00). CMPCX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: CMPCX (32 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). CMPCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). CMPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMPCX: TRQZX (0) vs CMPCX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.47 vs. CMPCX (-6.03). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -13.33 vs. CMPCX (-28.71).
| CMPCX | TRQZX | CMPCX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.61 | 315% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.345 | 2.726 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 199M | 23.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.03 | 3.47 | -174% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.83 | 6.62 | -58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.71 | -13.33 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers