CMPGF
Price
$35.10
Change
+$0.05 (+0.14%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
59.81B
DMPZF
Price
$2.79
Change
-$0.51 (-15.45%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGF vs DMPZF

Header iconCMPGF vs DMPZF Comparison
Open Charts CMPGF vs DMPZFBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$35.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
Volume$1.85K
Capitalization59.81B
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$2.79
Change-$0.51 (-15.45%)
Volume$6.18K
Capitalization1.06B
CMPGF vs DMPZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGF vs. DMPZF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGF is a Hold and DMPZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGF: $35.10 vs. DMPZF: $2.79)
Brand notoriety: CMPGF and DMPZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGF: 255% vs. DMPZF: 845%
Market capitalization -- CMPGF: $59.81B vs. DMPZF: $1.06B
CMPGF [@Restaurants] is valued at $59.81B. DMPZF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDMPZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DMPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGF is a better buy in the long-term than DMPZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DMPZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DMPZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMPGF and DMPZF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMPGF (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.89% price change this week, while DMPZF (@Restaurants) price change was -15.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.70% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGF($59.8B) has a higher market cap than DMPZF($1.06B). CMPGF has higher P/E ratio than DMPZF: CMPGF (40.86) vs DMPZF (10.60). CMPGF YTD gains are higher at: 8.393 vs. DMPZF (-27.344). CMPGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. DMPZF (162M). CMPGF has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. DMPZF (25.9M). DMPZF has less debt than CMPGF: DMPZF (536M) vs CMPGF (7.12B). CMPGF has higher revenues than DMPZF: CMPGF (43.8B) vs DMPZF (674M).
CMPGFDMPZFCMPGF / DMPZF
Capitalization59.8B1.06B5,652%
EBITDA3.6B162M2,222%
Gain YTD8.393-27.344-31%
P/E Ratio40.8610.60386%
Revenue43.8B674M6,499%
Total Cash437M25.9M1,687%
Total Debt7.12B536M1,328%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGF vs DMPZF: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGF
DMPZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8792
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7100
SMR RATING
1..100
9411
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5189
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2690
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DMPZF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGF (46). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMPZF (100). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew significantly faster than DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

DMPZF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMPGF (94). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew significantly faster than CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMPZF (89). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMPZF (90). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGFDMPZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIVDX15.55N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Large Cap Value Admin
MEMHX38.95N/A
N/A
MFS Emerging Markets Equity R4
MSCFX29.30N/A
N/A
Mairs & Power Small Cap
GCEPX9.81N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income P
OASGX11.58-0.02
-0.17%
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth A

CMPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGF and CMPGY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGF and CMPGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGF
1D Price
Change %
CMPGF100%
N/A
CMPGY - CMPGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
WEN - CMPGF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
DIN - CMPGF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
LOCO - CMPGF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
JDWPY - CMPGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DMPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMPZF and BDL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMPZF and BDL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMPZF
1D Price
Change %
DMPZF100%
N/A
BDL - DMPZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+8.94%
DPUKY - DMPZF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGY - DMPZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
CMPGF - DMPZF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRUS - DMPZF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More