CMPGF
Price
$35.10
Change
+$0.05 (+0.14%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
59.81B
DPUKY
Price
$5.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGF vs DPUKY

Header iconCMPGF vs DPUKY Comparison
Open Charts CMPGF vs DPUKYBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$35.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
Volume$1.85K
Capitalization59.81B
Dominos Pizza UK and IRL
Price$5.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization1.06B
CMPGF vs DPUKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGF vs. DPUKY commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGF is a Hold and DPUKY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGF: $35.10 vs. DPUKY: $5.45)
Brand notoriety: CMPGF and DPUKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGF: 255% vs. DPUKY: 27%
Market capitalization -- CMPGF: $59.81B vs. DPUKY: $1.06B
CMPGF [@Restaurants] is valued at $59.81B. DPUKY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDPUKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DPUKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGF is a better buy in the long-term than DPUKY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPUKY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DPUKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGF is a better buy in the short-term than DPUKY.

Price Growth

CMPGF (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.89% price change this week, while DPUKY (@Restaurants) price change was -16.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.65% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGF($59.8B) has a higher market cap than DPUKY($1.06B). CMPGF has higher P/E ratio than DPUKY: CMPGF (40.86) vs DPUKY (10.35). CMPGF YTD gains are higher at: 8.393 vs. DPUKY (-29.568). CMPGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. DPUKY (178M). CMPGF has higher revenues than DPUKY: CMPGF (43.8B) vs DPUKY (664M).
CMPGFDPUKYCMPGF / DPUKY
Capitalization59.8B1.06B5,652%
EBITDA3.6B178M2,022%
Gain YTD8.393-29.568-28%
P/E Ratio40.8610.35395%
Revenue43.8B664M6,596%
Total Cash437MN/A-
Total Debt7.12BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGF vs DPUKY: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGF
DPUKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8775
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7100
SMR RATING
1..100
9411
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5189
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2686
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPUKY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGF (46). This means that DPUKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPUKY (100). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew significantly faster than DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

DPUKY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMPGF (94). This means that DPUKY’s stock grew significantly faster than CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPUKY (89). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPUKY (86). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGFDPUKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIVFX14.00N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Large Cap Value R6
MEMRX34.13N/A
N/A
MFS Emerging Markets Equity R1
SCHLX38.58N/A
N/A
DWS Health and Wellness S
GCEJX9.80N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Inv
OCSGX6.79-0.01
-0.15%
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth C

CMPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGF and CMPGY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGF and CMPGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGF
1D Price
Change %
CMPGF100%
N/A
CMPGY - CMPGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
WEN - CMPGF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
DIN - CMPGF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
LOCO - CMPGF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
JDWPY - CMPGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DPUKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPUKY and SHMY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPUKY and SHMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPUKY
1D Price
Change %
DPUKY100%
N/A
SHMY - DPUKY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DENN - DPUKY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
DMPZF - DPUKY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMZPY - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
-9.77%
More