CMPGF
Price
$33.90
Change
-$0.76 (-2.19%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
57.24B
DPZUF
Price
$11.80
Change
-$0.45 (-3.67%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGF vs DPZUF

Header iconCMPGF vs DPZUF Comparison
Open Charts CMPGF vs DPZUFBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$33.90
Change-$0.76 (-2.19%)
Volume$337
Capitalization57.24B
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$11.80
Change-$0.45 (-3.67%)
Volume$408
Capitalization1.11B
CMPGF vs DPZUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGF vs. DPZUF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGF is a Hold and DPZUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGF: $33.90 vs. DPZUF: $11.80)
Brand notoriety: CMPGF and DPZUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGF: 64% vs. DPZUF: 27%
Market capitalization -- CMPGF: $56.71B vs. DPZUF: $1.13B
CMPGF [@Restaurants] is valued at $56.71B. DPZUF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $214.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDPZUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGF is a better buy in the long-term than DPZUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPZUF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMPGF and DPZUF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMPGF (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while DPZUF (@Restaurants) price change was -3.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-2.31% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGF($57.2B) has a higher market cap than DPZUF($1.11B). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than CMPGF: DPZUF (130.03) vs CMPGF (39.47). CMPGF YTD gains are higher at: 4.707 vs. DPZUF (-35.870). CMPGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. DPZUF (195M). CMPGF has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. DPZUF (87.7M). DPZUF has less debt than CMPGF: DPZUF (1.46B) vs CMPGF (7.12B). CMPGF has higher revenues than DPZUF: CMPGF (43.8B) vs DPZUF (2.26B).
CMPGFDPZUFCMPGF / DPZUF
Capitalization57.2B1.11B5,153%
EBITDA3.6B195M1,846%
Gain YTD4.707-35.870-13%
P/E Ratio39.47130.0330%
Revenue43.8B2.26B1,935%
Total Cash437M87.7M498%
Total Debt7.12B1.46B488%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGF vs DPZUF: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGF
DPZUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2490
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7100
SMR RATING
1..100
9790
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5591
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
196
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPZUF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPGF (42). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZUF (100). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPGF (97). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (91). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPGF (19). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGFDPZUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSSS8.870.45
+5.34%
SuRo Capital Corp
VSME1.100.02
+1.50%
VS Media Holdings Limited
ABUS3.13N/A
N/A
Arbutus Biopharma Corp
PLTK4.56-0.02
-0.44%
Playtika Holding Corp
H146.87-1.47
-0.99%
Hyatt Hotels Corp

CMPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGF and CMPGY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGF and CMPGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGF
1D Price
Change %
CMPGF100%
N/A
CMPGY - CMPGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
WEN - CMPGF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
DIN - CMPGF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
LOCO - CMPGF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
JDWPY - CMPGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and RAVE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and RAVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
N/A
RAVE - DPZUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDVB - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
CMPGF - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMZPY - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More