Advertisement
CMS vs ED
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) vs. Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CMS and ED are both regulated utilities with stable dividend profiles, but CMS has faced recent earnings pressure while ED shows expected earnings growth.
- Recent market activity highlights CMS strategic shift toward core regulated operations, contrasting with ED consistent focus on its New York service territory.
- Year-to-date performance shows ED outperforming CMS modestly amid broader sector stability.
- Risk factors differ: CMS navigates operational simplification, while ED prepares for quarterly results with analyst optimism.
- Sector exposure remains similar in utilities, yet geographic and business mix variations influence relative positioning.
- Market sentiment reflects caution for CMS post-earnings and anticipation for ED upcoming report.
Introduction
Investors and traders often compare CMS and ED to evaluate relative value within the regulated utilities sector. Both companies deliver essential energy services and maintain dividend-oriented profiles that appeal to income-focused portfolios. This analysis examines recent performance, business models, and market positioning to assist those assessing stability versus growth catalysts in a defensive equity allocation. The comparison provides context for portfolio construction without implying specific recommendations.
CMS Overview and Recent Performance
CMS Energy Corporation operates primarily as a Michigan-based energy provider through electric and gas utility segments. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near $72, reflecting a year-to-date return of approximately 4.5%. Recent market activity includes second-quarter adjusted earnings of $0.37 per share, down from the prior year, alongside a strategic decision to exit non-core renewable development outside its home state. These developments have contributed to tempered sentiment as the company emphasizes regulated operations.
ED Overview and Recent Performance
Consolidated Edison, Inc. serves as a major utility provider in the New York metropolitan area with electric, gas, and steam operations. The stock recently closed around $109, posting a year-to-date return near 9.7%. Recent market activity centers on preparations for the second-quarter earnings release scheduled for early August, with analysts projecting modest year-over-year earnings per share growth. Stable operations and consistent dividend history have supported relatively steady positioning amid sector-wide interest rates sensitivity.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many targeting specific equity sets. Users can review ranges of historical win rates, drawdowns, and return metrics to identify suitable options. The platform offers a neutral informational resource for exploring automated trading approaches. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CMS and ED operate within the regulated utilities sector yet differ in geographic focus and recent catalysts. CMS business model centers on Michigan operations with an ongoing simplification that prioritizes core utility earnings, while ED maintains a broader multi-service footprint in the Northeast. Recent momentum favors ED through anticipated earnings expansion, contrasting CMS post-earnings adjustments. Risk factors include regulatory exposure for both, with CMS additionally managing transition-related volatility. Market sentiment appears more anticipatory for ED ahead of its report and more cautious for CMS following strategic announcements.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic preference to ED in the current environment. Factors include steadier recent performance and clearer near-term earnings visibility compared with CMS ongoing operational adjustments. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to prevailing data patterns rather than guarantees of future outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMS is a Hold and ED is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileED’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ED’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- ED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while ED (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
ED is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-1.86% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| CMS | ED | CMS / ED | |
| Capitalization | 22.3B | 39.9B | 56% |
| EBITDA | 3.3B | 6.35B | 52% |
| Gain YTD | 3.960 | 10.490 | 38% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.36 | 17.76 | 120% |
| Revenue | 8.81B | 17.2B | 51% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 147M | - |
| Total Debt | 19.3B | 27.2B | 71% |
CMS | ED | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ED's Valuation (60) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (64). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (45). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's SMR Rating (67) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (76). This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (59). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (60). This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
| CMS | ED | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 41% | 4 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 37% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 49% | 13 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 42% | 8 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 30% | 4 days ago 23% |
Advertisement
ED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.