Advertisement
CMS vs ETR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) vs. Entergy Corporation (ETR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CMS delivered Q1 2026 adjusted EPS of $1.13, beating estimates, with reaffirmed full-year guidance of $3.83–$3.90, supported by industrial sales growth and renewable investments.
- ETR reported Q1 adjusted EPS of $0.86, slightly above expectations, driven by 6% retail sales growth including 15% industrial surge, and raised long-term EPS outlooks amid a $57 billion capital plan.
- YTD, ETR has significantly outperformed CMS with 28.50% returns versus 7.95%, reflecting stronger momentum from data center demand.
- Both utilities benefit from regulated operations and clean energy shifts, but ETR's exposure to high-growth industrial loads positions it for faster expansion.
- CMS offers a higher dividend yield at 3.04% compared to ETR's 2.18%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Market caps differ markedly, with ETR at $53.7 billion versus CMS's $23.1 billion, influencing liquidity and scale.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines CMS Energy Corporation and ETRgy Corporation, two leading regulated electric utilities navigating the transition to cleaner energy amid rising demand from industrial users like data centers. Both companies operate in stable sectors with predictable cash flows from rate-regulated operations, making them attractive for defensive portfolios. Investors seeking relative performance insights, dividend reliability, and growth potential in utilities will find this analysis relevant, particularly in the context of recent earnings beats and capital investment plans driving sector momentum.
CMS Overview and Recent Performance
CMS Energy Corporation, headquartered in Michigan, primarily operates through its subsidiary Consumers Energy, providing electricity and natural gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers. The company focuses on grid modernization, renewable expansion, and infrastructure reliability. In recent market activity, CMS shares have shown resilience, with a YTD return of about 8% as of early May 2026, trading around $75 after a 52-week range of $68–$80. Q1 2026 results highlighted adjusted EPS of $1.13, surpassing estimates despite weather headwinds, fueled by 5.9% growth in industrial electricity sales and a supportive regulatory environment. The firm reaffirmed 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $3.83–$3.90 and continues investing in clean energy, with weather-normalized sales up 1.1% year-over-year. Sentiment remains positive due to consistent execution and a low beta of 0.37, indicating lower volatility.
ETR Overview and Recent Performance
ETRgy Corporation serves customers across Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, emphasizing electric production, transmission, and distribution with a growing renewable portfolio. Recent weeks have seen robust price action, with shares near $117, reflecting a YTD gain of 28.5% and a 52-week range of $79–$118. Q1 2026 adjusted EPS came in at $0.86, edging past forecasts, supported by 6% retail sales growth—including 15% from industrials—and revenue up 12% to $3.19 billion. Key drivers include hyperscale data center deals, like with Meta, prompting a $57 billion four-year capital plan expansion. The company affirmed 2026 adjusted EPS of $4.25–$4.45 while lifting longer-term targets, underscoring demand from high-load sectors. With a beta of 0.53, ETR balances growth and stability, boosting investor sentiment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions—based on metrics like annualized returns up to +169%, win rates from 51% to 88%, and profit factors reaching 11.70—earn a spot among the 25 highlighted bots. These employ diverse strategies, including trend-following, TP/SL corridors (e.g., 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss), fundamental analysis (FA), and multi-agent systems, with trade durations from 1 day to 48 days and coverage of 1 to 18 tickers per bot. Focused on hot sectors like semiconductors, data centers, and industrials, they offer real-time signals via AI Trading Signal Agents, Virtual Agents with risk management, or Brokerage Agents. Traders can explore these high performers to potentially enhance returns; visit the Trending AI Robots page for details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CMS and ETR thrive on regulated utility models, delivering electricity via transmission and distribution networks, but differ in scale and growth drivers. ETR's larger footprint in high-demand Gulf states exposes it to faster industrial expansion, particularly data centers, contrasting CMS's Midwest focus on steady residential/commercial loads and gas operations. Recent momentum favors ETR, with superior YTD and multi-year returns tied to 15% industrial sales growth versus CMS's 6%. Risk profiles show CMS as less volatile (beta 0.37 vs. 0.53), while ETR faces higher operational costs from weather and capex. Sector exposure aligns in renewables, but ETR's $57 billion plan signals aggressive infrastructure bets. Market sentiment leans toward ETR for growth trade-offs, though CMS excels in dividend appeal.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors ETR over CMS, based on stronger trend consistency from data center catalysts, superior relative YTD performance, and upward revisions to long-term EPS amid robust industrial demand. While CMS offers stability and earnings reliability, ETR's positioning suggests higher probability of outperformance in growth-oriented utility plays, though subject to execution risks and interest rate sensitivity.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMS is a Hold and ETR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileETR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ETR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ETR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- ETR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.45% price change this week, while ETR (@Electric Utilities) price change was -3.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
ETR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-0.80% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| CMS | ETR | CMS / ETR | |
| Capitalization | 22.6B | 50.6B | 45% |
| EBITDA | 3.4B | 6.24B | 54% |
| Gain YTD | 6.438 | 21.048 | 31% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.28 | 28.20 | 72% |
| Revenue | 8.82B | 13.3B | 66% |
| Total Cash | 175M | 3.57B | 5% |
| Total Debt | 19.1B | 34.1B | 56% |
CMS | ETR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMS's Valuation (65) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ETR (75). This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to ETR’s over the last 12 months.
ETR's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMS (50). This means that ETR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's SMR Rating (62) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ETR (67). This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to ETR’s over the last 12 months.
ETR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (59). This means that ETR’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
ETR's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (56). This means that ETR’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
| CMS | ETR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 31% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 36% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 49% | 20 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 39% | 7 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FTNY | 7.78 | -0.03 | -0.35% |
| Franklin New York Municipal Income ETF | |||
| IBTP | 25.01 | -0.12 | -0.46% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Trsy ETF | |||
| MDYG | 103.52 | -1.02 | -0.98% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md Cp GrETF | |||
| EIRL | 72.68 | -0.92 | -1.25% |
| iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | |||
| FOF | 13.48 | -0.19 | -1.39% |
| Cohen & Steers Closed End Opportunity Fund | |||
CMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMS has been closely correlated with DTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMS jumps, then DTE could also see price increases.
ETR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ETR has been closely correlated with AEE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ETR jumps, then AEE could also see price increases.