Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMSCX vs NRGSX
CMSCX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CMSCX vs NRGSX
CMSCX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMSCX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMSCX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. CMSCX (3.41B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CMSCX: NRGSX (0.44) vs CMSCX (0.00). CMSCX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CMSCX (30 years) vs NRGSX (14 years). CMSCX (0.97) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CMSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMSCX: NRGSX (0) vs CMSCX (2000). CMSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.12 vs. NRGSX (-8.11). CMSCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.78 vs. NRGSX (-23.14).
| CMSCX | NRGSX | CMSCX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.74 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.74 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.432 | 11.425 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.41B | 6.95B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.12 | -8.11 | -174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.82 | 2.69 | 2,704% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.78 | -23.14 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.68 | 10.53 | 1,070% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers