CMSQF
Price
$26.00
Change
+$1.19 (+4.80%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
10.1B
DSEEY
Price
$7.12
Change
+$0.28 (+4.09%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.95B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMSQF vs DSEEY

Header iconCMSQF vs DSEEY Comparison
Open Charts CMSQF vs DSEEYBanner chart's image
Computershare
Price$26.00
Change+$1.19 (+4.80%)
Volume$589
Capitalization10.1B
Daiwa Securities Group
Price$7.12
Change+$0.28 (+4.09%)
Volume$3.34K
Capitalization7.95B
CMSQF vs DSEEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DSEEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMSQF vs. DSEEY commentary
Jul 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMSQF is a Hold and DSEEY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CMSQF: $26.00 vs. DSEEY: $7.12)
Brand notoriety: CMSQF and DSEEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMSQF: 252% vs. DSEEY: 44%
Market capitalization -- CMSQF: $10.1B vs. DSEEY: $7.95B
CMSQF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $10.1B. DSEEY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMSQF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDSEEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMSQF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DSEEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMSQF is a better buy in the long-term than DSEEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMSQF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DSEEY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMSQF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • DSEEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DSEEY is a better buy in the short-term than CMSQF.

Price Growth

CMSQF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DSEEY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

DSEEY is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.45% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMSQF($10.1B) has a higher market cap than DSEEY($7.95B). CMSQF has higher P/E ratio than DSEEY: CMSQF (29.59) vs DSEEY (17.39). CMSQF YTD gains are higher at: 37.931 vs. DSEEY (7.716). CMSQF has less debt than DSEEY: CMSQF (2.77B) vs DSEEY (16.85T). DSEEY has higher revenues than CMSQF: DSEEY (571B) vs CMSQF (2.9B).
CMSQFDSEEYCMSQF / DSEEY
Capitalization10.1B7.95B127%
EBITDA825MN/A-
Gain YTD37.9317.716492%
P/E Ratio29.5917.39170%
Revenue2.9B571B1%
Total Cash1.08BN/A-
Total Debt2.77B16.85T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMSQF vs DSEEY: Fundamental Ratings
CMSQF
DSEEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9725
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
534
SMR RATING
1..100
641
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2889
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSEEY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQF (38). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew similarly to CMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as DSEEY (34). This means that CMSQF’s stock grew similarly to DSEEY’s over the last 12 months.

DSEEY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMSQF (64). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as DSEEY (58). This means that CMSQF’s stock grew similarly to DSEEY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSEEY (89). This means that CMSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSEEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMSQFDSEEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DSEEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIZD16.820.18
+1.08%
VanEck BDC Income ETF
XPAY54.080.30
+0.56%
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
FLSP24.130.02
+0.08%
Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF
HLGE31.91N/A
N/A
Hartford Longevity Economy ETF
SWZ6.22-0.02
-0.32%
Total Return Securities Inc

CMSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMSQF and CFNCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMSQF and CFNCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMSQF
1D Price
Change %
CMSQF100%
N/A
CFNCF - CMSQF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCQEF - CMSQF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CURN - CMSQF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
CSOL - CMSQF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSEEY - CMSQF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.09%
More

DSEEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DSEEY has been loosely correlated with NMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DSEEY jumps, then NMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSEEY
1D Price
Change %
DSEEY100%
+4.09%
NMR - DSEEY
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
JPXGY - DSEEY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
CMSQY - DSEEY
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
GS - DSEEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
AAMTF - DSEEY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More