CMSQY
Price
$23.08
Change
-$0.10 (-0.43%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
13.43B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DSEEY
Price
$7.92
Change
-$0.39 (-4.69%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
10.99B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMSQY vs DSEEY

Header iconCMSQY vs DSEEY Comparison
Open Charts CMSQY vs DSEEYBanner chart's image
Computershare
Price$23.08
Change-$0.10 (-0.43%)
Volume$82.95K
Capitalization13.43B
Daiwa Securities Group
Price$7.92
Change-$0.39 (-4.69%)
Volume$347
Capitalization10.99B
CMSQY vs DSEEY Comparison Chart in %
CMSQY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DSEEY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMSQY vs. DSEEY commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMSQY is a Hold and DSEEY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CMSQY: $23.08 vs. DSEEY: $7.92)
Brand notoriety: CMSQY and DSEEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMSQY: 146% vs. DSEEY: 4%
Market capitalization -- CMSQY: $13.43B vs. DSEEY: $10.99B
CMSQY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $13.43B. DSEEY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $10.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMSQY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDSEEY’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CMSQY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DSEEY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, DSEEY is a better buy in the long-term than CMSQY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMSQY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DSEEY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMSQY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DSEEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DSEEY is a better buy in the short-term than CMSQY.

Price Growth

CMSQY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.57% price change this week, while DSEEY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -6.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -8.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

DSEEY is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-8.13% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMSQY($13.4B) has a higher market cap than DSEEY($11B). CMSQY has higher P/E ratio than DSEEY: CMSQY (22.44) vs DSEEY (11.23). DSEEY YTD gains are higher at: 19.788 vs. CMSQY (13.998). CMSQY has less debt than DSEEY: CMSQY (1.92B) vs DSEEY (5.43T). DSEEY has higher revenues than CMSQY: DSEEY (824B) vs CMSQY (3.12B).
CMSQYDSEEYCMSQY / DSEEY
Capitalization13.4B11B122%
EBITDA1.07BN/A-
Gain YTD13.99819.78871%
P/E Ratio22.4411.23200%
Revenue3.12B824B0%
Total Cash1.38BN/A-
Total Debt1.92B5.43T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMSQY vs DSEEY: Fundamental Ratings
CMSQY
DSEEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6821
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1731
SMR RATING
1..100
501
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4826
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSEEY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQY (27). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew similarly to CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as DSEEY (31). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to DSEEY’s over the last 12 months.

DSEEY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMSQY (50). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

DSEEY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQY (59). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew similarly to CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

DSEEY's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQY (48). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew similarly to CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMSQYDSEEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMSQY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DSEEY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UCO21.440.48
+2.29%
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil
FIXP19.87N/A
N/A
FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Inc Prm ETF
JHDV39.65N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
RGT12.17-0.10
-0.81%
Royce Global Value Trust
IHDG46.38-0.51
-1.09%
WisdomTree Intl Hdgd Qual Div Gr ETF

CMSQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMSQY has been loosely correlated with MQBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMSQY jumps, then MQBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMSQY
1D Price
Change %
CMSQY100%
-0.43%
MQBKY - CMSQY
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
ASXFY - CMSQY
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
SNEX - CMSQY
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
GS - CMSQY
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
NMR - CMSQY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
More

DSEEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DSEEY has been loosely correlated with NMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DSEEY jumps, then NMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSEEY
1D Price
Change %
DSEEY100%
-4.72%
NMR - DSEEY
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
JPXGY - DSEEY
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
CMSQY - DSEEY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
GS - DSEEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
AAMTF - DSEEY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More