Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMTFX vs SLMCX
CMTFX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts CMTFX vs SLMCX
CMTFX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMTFX vs. SLMCX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTFX is a Hold and SLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 26.8B vs. CMTFX (5.18B). CMTFX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMTFX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: CMTFX (26 years) vs SLMCX (43 years). SLMCX (1.16) is less costly to investors than CMTFX (0.91). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. CMTFX (6.00). CMTFX (2000) and SLMCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.59 vs. CMTFX (30.30). CMTFX return over 5 years is better than : 90.37 vs. SLMCX (74.58).
| CMTFX | SLMCX | CMTFX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.16 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.16 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.248 | 42.393 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.18B | 26.8B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.30 | 63.59 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.92 | 104.37 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.37 | 74.58 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 529.90 | 281.22 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers