Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMUAX vs MVCAX
CMUAX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts CMUAX vs MVCAX
CMUAX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMUAX vs. MVCAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMUAX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. CMUAX (3.28B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than CMUAX: MVCAX (1.08) vs CMUAX (0.46). CMUAX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: CMUAX (25 years) vs MVCAX (25 years). CMUAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (0.98). MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CMUAX (15.00). CMUAX (6%) and MVCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMUAX: MVCAX (1000) vs CMUAX (2000). CMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.71 vs. MVCAX (5.51). CMUAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.82 vs. MVCAX (15.15).
| CMUAX | MVCAX | CMUAX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.97 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.98 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.921 | 12.903 | 162% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 16.8B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.08 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.71 | 5.51 | 340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.02 | 23.61 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.82 | 15.15 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.47 | 83.46 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement