CMUV
Price
$24.10
Change
+$0.21 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
26.39M
MLGF
Price
$20.47
Change
-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
41.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMUV vs MLGF

Header iconCMUV vs MLGF Comparison
Open Charts CMUV vs MLGFBanner chart's image
CMUV Ban
Price$24.10
Change+$0.21 (+0.88%)
Volume$340
Capitalization26.39M
Malaga Financial
Price$20.47
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Volume$550
Capitalization41.82M
CMUV vs MLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMUV vs. MLGF commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMUV is a Buy and MLGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CMUV: $24.10 vs. MLGF: $20.47)
Brand notoriety: CMUV and MLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMUV: 20% vs. MLGF: 22%
Market capitalization -- CMUV: $26.39M vs. MLGF: $41.82M
CMUV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $26.39M. MLGF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $41.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMUV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMUV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MLGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMUV is a better buy in the long-term than MLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMUV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMUV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MLGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMUV and MLGF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMUV (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLGF (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLGF($41.8M) has a higher market cap than CMUV($26.4M). MLGF (7.61) and CMUV (7.39) have similar P/E ratio . CMUV YTD gains are higher at: 18.247 vs. MLGF (-6.343). MLGF has higher revenues than CMUV: MLGF (18M) vs CMUV (11.7M).
CMUVMLGFCMUV / MLGF
Capitalization26.4M41.8M63%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.247-6.343-288%
P/E Ratio7.397.6197%
Revenue11.7M18M65%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A263M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMUV vs MLGF: Fundamental Ratings
CMUV
MLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3067
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
314
SMR RATING
1..100
5752
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3056
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLGF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMUV (76). This means that MLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

CMUV's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGF (14). This means that CMUV’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CMUV (57). This means that MLGF’s stock grew similarly to CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

CMUV's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGF (58). This means that CMUV’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMUV's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGF (56). This means that CMUV’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMUVMLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
11%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INIS0.11N/A
+3.20%
International Isotopes, Inc.
SLTFF0.04N/A
N/A
Pegasus Resources Inc.
LAAOF9.49N/A
N/A
Li Auto Inc.
EBCOF15.53N/A
N/A
Ebara Corp.
OXBDF6.24-0.36
-5.45%
Oxford Biomedica PLC

CMUV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMUV and FMCB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMUV and FMCB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMUV
1D Price
Change %
CMUV100%
N/A
FMCB - CMUV
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.44%
MLGF - CMUV
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVBT - CMUV
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
CNBP - CMUV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKHGY - CMUV
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More

MLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLGF and RBKB have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLGF and RBKB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGF
1D Price
Change %
MLGF100%
N/A
RBKB - MLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
FSRL - MLGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMUV - MLGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDBKF - MLGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLYBY - MLGF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More