CMUV
Price
$24.75
Change
+$0.57 (+2.36%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
43.23M
MLGF
Price
$20.17
Change
-$0.18 (-0.88%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
190.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMUV vs MLGF

Header iconCMUV vs MLGF Comparison
Open Charts CMUV vs MLGFBanner chart's image
CMUV Ban
Price$24.75
Change+$0.57 (+2.36%)
Volume$51.28K
Capitalization43.23M
Malaga Financial
Price$20.17
Change-$0.18 (-0.88%)
Volume$15.78K
Capitalization190.08M
CMUV vs MLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMUV vs. MLGF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMUV is a Hold and MLGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CMUV: $24.75 vs. MLGF: $20.17)
Brand notoriety: CMUV and MLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMUV: 559% vs. MLGF: 504%
Market capitalization -- CMUV: $43.23M vs. MLGF: $190.08M
CMUV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $43.23M. MLGF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $190.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMUV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMUV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MLGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMUV is a better buy in the long-term than MLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMUV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMUV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MLGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMUV is a better buy in the short-term than MLGF.

Price Growth

CMUV (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLGF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.00% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLGF($190M) has a higher market cap than CMUV($43.2M). CMUV has higher P/E ratio than MLGF: CMUV (11.90) vs MLGF (8.40). CMUV YTD gains are higher at: 21.436 vs. MLGF (-7.716). CMUV has less debt than MLGF: CMUV (8.74M) vs MLGF (263M). MLGF has higher revenues than CMUV: MLGF (45.3M) vs CMUV (12.3M).
CMUVMLGFCMUV / MLGF
Capitalization43.2M190M23%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.436-7.716-278%
P/E Ratio11.908.40142%
Revenue12.3M45.3M27%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt8.74M263M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMUV vs MLGF: Fundamental Ratings
CMUV
MLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9972
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
319
SMR RATING
1..100
5651
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4673
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2656
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLGF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as CMUV (46). This means that MLGF’s stock grew similarly to CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

CMUV's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGF (19). This means that CMUV’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CMUV (56). This means that MLGF’s stock grew similarly to CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

CMUV's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGF (73). This means that CMUV’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMUV's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGF (56). This means that CMUV’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMUVMLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
11%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WRLC455.004.49
+1.00%
Windrock Ld Co.
ALMMF0.92N/A
N/A
Aluminum Corporation of China Ltd.
KHTRF4.72N/A
N/A
Knight Therapeutics Inc
ROYUF73.11N/A
N/A
Royal Unibrew A S
CTARF1.87-0.13
-6.50%
Centaurus Energy Inc.

CMUV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMUV and FMCB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMUV and FMCB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMUV
1D Price
Change %
CMUV100%
N/A
FMCB - CMUV
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
MLGF - CMUV
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVBT - CMUV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBP - CMUV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKHGY - CMUV
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
More

MLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLGF and RBKB have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLGF and RBKB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGF
1D Price
Change %
MLGF100%
N/A
RBKB - MLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
FSRL - MLGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMUV - MLGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDBKF - MLGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLYBY - MLGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
More