Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMVIX vs RGEBX
CMVIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CMVIX vs RGEBX
CMVIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMVIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMVIX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CMVIX (1.97B). CMVIX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMVIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CMVIX (33 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CMVIX (0.76). CMVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMVIX: RGEBX (250) vs CMVIX (2000000). CMVIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.58 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). CMVIX return over 5 years is better than : 25.99 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| CMVIX | RGEBX | CMVIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.08 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.426 | 8.727 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.97B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.58 | -0.77 | -850% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.62 | 39.77 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.99 | 9.71 | 268% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.86 | 97.58 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement