Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMVIX vs RGEBX
CMVIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CMVIX vs RGEBX
CMVIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMVIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMVIX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CMVIX (1.89B). CMVIX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMVIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CMVIX (33 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CMVIX (0.76). CMVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMVIX: RGEBX (250) vs CMVIX (2000000). CMVIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.24 vs. RGEBX (7.66). CMVIX return over 5 years is better than : 30.35 vs. RGEBX (12.07).
| CMVIX | RGEBX | CMVIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.08 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.983 | 6.118 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.89B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.24 | 7.66 | 277% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.26 | 42.13 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.35 | 12.07 | 252% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.74 | 104.15 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement