CNA
Price
$49.22
Change
-$0.46 (-0.93%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
12.3B
71 days until earnings call
UFCS
Price
$25.47
Change
-$0.73 (-2.79%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
550.29M
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNA vs UFCS

Header iconCNA vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts CNA vs UFCSBanner chart's image
CNA Financial
Price$49.22
Change-$0.46 (-0.93%)
Volume$580.77K
Capitalization12.3B
United Fire Group
Price$25.47
Change-$0.73 (-2.79%)
Volume$152.91K
Capitalization550.29M
CNA vs UFCS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNA vs. UFCS commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNA is a Hold and UFCS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CNA: $49.22 vs. UFCS: $25.47)
Brand notoriety: CNA and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNA: 215% vs. UFCS: 100%
Market capitalization -- CNA: $12.3B vs. UFCS: $550.29M
CNA [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $12.3B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $550.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNA is a better buy in the long-term than UFCS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNA is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

CNA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -3.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNA is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.68% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNA($12.3B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($550M). UFCS has higher P/E ratio than CNA: UFCS (41.53) vs CNA (10.10). CNA YTD gains are higher at: 1.757 vs. UFCS (-10.475). CNA has more cash in the bank: 42.9B vs. UFCS (102M). UFCS has less debt than CNA: UFCS (50M) vs CNA (3.03B). CNA has higher revenues than UFCS: CNA (13.1B) vs UFCS (1.1B).
CNAUFCSCNA / UFCS
Capitalization12.3B550M2,236%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.757-10.475-17%
P/E Ratio10.1041.5324%
Revenue13.1B1.1B1,193%
Total Cash42.9B102M42,059%
Total Debt3.03B50M6,062%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNA vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
CNA
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7838
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
30100
SMR RATING
1..100
9380
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1874
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNA's Valuation (22) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (36) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

CNA's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for UFCS (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew significantly faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (80) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNA (93) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to CNA’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNA (52) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to CNA’s over the last 12 months.

CNA's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (74) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNAUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BICO.X0.1847400.011567
+6.68%
Biconomy cryptocurrency
ACA.X0.0553830.002547
+4.82%
Acala Token cryptocurrency
AXS.X4.2624590.068089
+1.62%
Axie Infinity cryptocurrency
SUSD.X0.9826180.000458
+0.05%
sUSD cryptocurrency
PUTD21.25N/A
N/A
Cboe(R) Validus S&P 500(R) Dyn PtwIdxETF

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
-2.79%
SAFT - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
L - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
CINF - UFCS
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
CNA - UFCS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
AFG - UFCS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
More