CNFR
Price
$0.77
Change
-$0.05 (-6.10%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
9.45M
81 days until earnings call
MCY
Price
$74.21
Change
-$0.90 (-1.20%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.11B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNFR vs MCY

Header iconCNFR vs MCY Comparison
Open Charts CNFR vs MCYBanner chart's image
Conifer Holdings
Price$0.77
Change-$0.05 (-6.10%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization9.45M
Mercury General
Price$74.21
Change-$0.90 (-1.20%)
Volume$280.98K
Capitalization4.11B
CNFR vs MCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNFR vs. MCY commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNFR is a Hold and MCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CNFR: $0.77 vs. MCY: $74.21)
Brand notoriety: CNFR and MCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNFR: 42% vs. MCY: 97%
Market capitalization -- CNFR: $9.45M vs. MCY: $4.11B
CNFR [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $9.45M. MCY’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $4.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $144.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNFR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNFR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCY is a better buy in the long-term than CNFR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNFR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNFR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCY is a better buy in the short-term than CNFR.

Price Growth

CNFR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -5.76% price change this week, while MCY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +4.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNFR is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MCY is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.95% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCY($4.11B) has a higher market cap than CNFR($9.45M). MCY YTD gains are higher at: 12.829 vs. CNFR (-33.927). MCY has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. CNFR (101M). CNFR has less debt than MCY: CNFR (12M) vs MCY (590M). MCY has higher revenues than CNFR: MCY (5.77B) vs CNFR (59.2M).
CNFRMCYCNFR / MCY
Capitalization9.45M4.11B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-33.92712.829-264%
P/E RatioN/A10.54-
Revenue59.2M5.77B1%
Total Cash101M1.4B7%
Total Debt12M590M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNFR vs MCY: Fundamental Ratings
CNFR
MCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
821
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
1149
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8450
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCY's Valuation (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNFR (64). This means that MCY’s stock grew similarly to CNFR’s over the last 12 months.

MCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNFR (100). This means that MCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNFR’s over the last 12 months.

CNFR's SMR Rating (11) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCY (49). This means that CNFR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCY’s over the last 12 months.

MCY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNFR (61). This means that MCY’s stock grew similarly to CNFR’s over the last 12 months.

MCY's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNFR (84). This means that MCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNFR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNFRMCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARWR20.511.73
+9.21%
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals
TSN56.800.50
+0.89%
Tyson Foods
ORGO4.730.03
+0.64%
Organogenesis Holdings
SDOT0.92-0.02
-1.61%
Sadot Group Inc
AMWL7.15-0.12
-1.65%
American Well Corp

CNFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNFR and MSADF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNFR and MSADF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNFR
1D Price
Change %
CNFR100%
-5.56%
MSADF - CNFR
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.40%
NODK - CNFR
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
SMPNY - CNFR
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
MCY - CNFR
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
DIISY - CNFR
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More