CNFR
Price
$1.12
Change
+$0.05 (+4.67%)
Updated
Oct 18, 11:14 AM (EDT)
19 days until earnings call
SMPNY
Price
$11.04
Change
-$0.13 (-1.16%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

CNFR vs SMPNY

Header iconCNFR vs SMPNY Comparison
Open Charts CNFR vs SMPNYBanner chart's image
Conifer Holdings
Price$1.12
Change+$0.05 (+4.67%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Sompo
Price$11.04
Change-$0.13 (-1.16%)
Volume$51.2K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CNFR vs SMPNY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMPNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CNFR vs. SMPNY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNFR is a Sell and SMPNY is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CNFR: $1.07 vs. SMPNY: $11.04)
Brand notoriety: CNFR and SMPNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNFR: 0% vs. SMPNY: 81%
Market capitalization -- CNFR: $15.4M vs. SMPNY: $14.87B
CNFR [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $15.4M. SMPNY’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $14.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNFR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMPNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNFR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMPNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMPNY is a better buy in the long-term than CNFR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMPNY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMPNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CNFR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -6.96% price change this week, while SMPNY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNFR is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.83% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMPNY($14.9B) has a higher market cap than CNFR($15.4M). CNFR has higher P/E ratio than SMPNY: CNFR (31.45) vs SMPNY (22.37). SMPNY YTD gains are higher at: 37.490 vs. CNFR (-2.718). SMPNY has more cash in the bank: 1.25T vs. CNFR (157M). CNFR has less debt than SMPNY: CNFR (25.3M) vs SMPNY (609B). SMPNY has higher revenues than CNFR: SMPNY (4.49T) vs CNFR (109M).
CNFRSMPNYCNFR / SMPNY
Capitalization15.4M14.9B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.71837.490-7%
P/E Ratio31.4522.37141%
Revenue109M4.49T0%
Total Cash157M1.25T0%
Total Debt25.3M609B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNFR vs SMPNY: Fundamental Ratings
CNFR
SMPNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
571
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10013
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8765
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMPNY's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CNFR (67) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SMPNY’s stock grew similarly to CNFR’s over the last 12 months.

SMPNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNFR (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SMPNY’s stock grew significantly faster than CNFR’s over the last 12 months.

SMPNY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CNFR (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SMPNY’s stock grew similarly to CNFR’s over the last 12 months.

SMPNY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CNFR (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SMPNY’s stock grew similarly to CNFR’s over the last 12 months.

SMPNY's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as CNFR (87) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SMPNY’s stock grew similarly to CNFR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMPNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMPNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

CNFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNFR and MSADF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNFR and MSADF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNFR
1D Price
Change %
CNFR100%
+0.94%
MSADF - CNFR
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
SMPNY - CNFR
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
MCY - CNFR
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
OXBR - CNFR
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.90%
MURGF - CNFR
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
More

SMPNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMPNY has been loosely correlated with TKOMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMPNY jumps, then TKOMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMPNY
1D Price
Change %
SMPNY100%
-1.95%
TKOMY - SMPNY
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
MSADY - SMPNY
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
MSADF - SMPNY
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
QBIEY - SMPNY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
HVRRY - SMPNY
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
More