Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNGAX vs NPFCX
CNGAX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CNGAX vs NPFCX
CNGAX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNGAX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNGAX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. CNGAX (46.5B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CNGAX: NPFCX (0.33) vs CNGAX (0.00). CNGAX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CNGAX (24 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CNGAX (0.75). CNGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). CNGAX (250) and NPFCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CNGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.94 vs. NPFCX (12.77). CNGAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.12 vs. NPFCX (13.27).
| CNGAX | NPFCX | CNGAX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.47 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.47 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.858 | 7.037 | 325% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.5B | 164B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.94 | 12.77 | 321% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.91 | 40.04 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.12 | 13.27 | 332% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.96 | 103.06 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement